单项和多项噩梦频率测量的比较

Q3 Psychology
W. Kelly, Johan Mathe
{"title":"单项和多项噩梦频率测量的比较","authors":"W. Kelly, Johan Mathe","doi":"10.11588/IJODR.2020.2.64362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nightmare frequency research usually relies on single-item measures. The current study compared some single- and multiple-item measures of nightmare frequency. Three single-item measures representing different response formats (binary, ordinal, and nominal) were compared with both an existing and newly devised multiple-item nightmare frequency scale, the Nightmare Frequency Index (NFI). To collect psychometric information on the new scale, 276 university students completed the NFI. A subsample of 146 participants completed additional measures of nightmare frequency and constructs previously related to nightmares. The NFI had adequate psychometric properties. Generally, nightmare frequency measures demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity. A higher-order nightmare frequency factor was found with all nightmare frequency measures contributing. Multiple-item measures had slightly higher average correlations than a binary single-item measure, but not ordinal or nominal single-item measures. The results are discussed in the context of choosing frequency measures for research","PeriodicalId":38642,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dream Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"136-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of single- and multiple-item nightmare frequency measures\",\"authors\":\"W. Kelly, Johan Mathe\",\"doi\":\"10.11588/IJODR.2020.2.64362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nightmare frequency research usually relies on single-item measures. The current study compared some single- and multiple-item measures of nightmare frequency. Three single-item measures representing different response formats (binary, ordinal, and nominal) were compared with both an existing and newly devised multiple-item nightmare frequency scale, the Nightmare Frequency Index (NFI). To collect psychometric information on the new scale, 276 university students completed the NFI. A subsample of 146 participants completed additional measures of nightmare frequency and constructs previously related to nightmares. The NFI had adequate psychometric properties. Generally, nightmare frequency measures demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity. A higher-order nightmare frequency factor was found with all nightmare frequency measures contributing. Multiple-item measures had slightly higher average correlations than a binary single-item measure, but not ordinal or nominal single-item measures. The results are discussed in the context of choosing frequency measures for research\",\"PeriodicalId\":38642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Dream Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"136-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Dream Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11588/IJODR.2020.2.64362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dream Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11588/IJODR.2020.2.64362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

噩梦频率的研究通常依赖于单项测量。目前的研究比较了噩梦频率的一些单项和多项指标。三个代表不同反应格式的单项测量(二元、有序和标称)被比较了现有的和新设计的多项目噩梦频率量表——噩梦频率指数(NFI)。为了收集新量表上的心理测量信息,276名大学生完成了NFI。146名参与者的子样本完成了噩梦频率和先前与噩梦相关的结构的额外测量。NFI具有足够的心理测量特性。一般来说,噩梦频率测量显示收敛效度和判别效度。高阶噩梦频率因子被发现与所有噩梦频率测量有关。多项测量的平均相关性略高于二元单项测量,但不是序数或名义单项测量。在选择频率测量进行研究的背景下讨论了这些结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of single- and multiple-item nightmare frequency measures
Nightmare frequency research usually relies on single-item measures. The current study compared some single- and multiple-item measures of nightmare frequency. Three single-item measures representing different response formats (binary, ordinal, and nominal) were compared with both an existing and newly devised multiple-item nightmare frequency scale, the Nightmare Frequency Index (NFI). To collect psychometric information on the new scale, 276 university students completed the NFI. A subsample of 146 participants completed additional measures of nightmare frequency and constructs previously related to nightmares. The NFI had adequate psychometric properties. Generally, nightmare frequency measures demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity. A higher-order nightmare frequency factor was found with all nightmare frequency measures contributing. Multiple-item measures had slightly higher average correlations than a binary single-item measure, but not ordinal or nominal single-item measures. The results are discussed in the context of choosing frequency measures for research
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Dream Research
International Journal of Dream Research Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信