国家管辖豁免案(德国诉意大利):国际法院与国际法发展背道而驰

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
Paula Wojcikiewicz Almeida
{"title":"国家管辖豁免案(德国诉意大利):国际法院与国际法发展背道而驰","authors":"Paula Wojcikiewicz Almeida","doi":"10.12804/REVISTAS.UROSARIO.EDU.CO/ACDI/A.6538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to assess the jurisdictional immunities of the State case before the International Court of Justice. In view of the position adopted by the majority of the members of the Court, the present article aims at critically examining the arguments that tend to consider that there is a conflict between State immunity and the rules of jus cogens, by arguing that the distinction between procedural and substantive rules is artificial and formalistic. In addition, State immunity is of a relative nature when serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, having the status of jus cogens rules, are concerned. It is necessary to carry out a progressive approach of State practice in the field of State immunities, which takes into account the current development of international law and the appearance of individuals as subjects of international law.","PeriodicalId":40328,"journal":{"name":"Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional-ACDI","volume":"11 1","pages":"21-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L’affaire des Immunités Juridictionnelles de l’Etat (Allemagne c. Italie): La Cour Internationale de Justice à contre-sens de l’évolution du Droit International\",\"authors\":\"Paula Wojcikiewicz Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.12804/REVISTAS.UROSARIO.EDU.CO/ACDI/A.6538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article is to assess the jurisdictional immunities of the State case before the International Court of Justice. In view of the position adopted by the majority of the members of the Court, the present article aims at critically examining the arguments that tend to consider that there is a conflict between State immunity and the rules of jus cogens, by arguing that the distinction between procedural and substantive rules is artificial and formalistic. In addition, State immunity is of a relative nature when serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, having the status of jus cogens rules, are concerned. It is necessary to carry out a progressive approach of State practice in the field of State immunities, which takes into account the current development of international law and the appearance of individuals as subjects of international law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional-ACDI\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"21-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional-ACDI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12804/REVISTAS.UROSARIO.EDU.CO/ACDI/A.6538\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional-ACDI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12804/REVISTAS.UROSARIO.EDU.CO/ACDI/A.6538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本条的目的是评估国际法院审理的国家案件的管辖豁免。鉴于法院大多数法官所采取的立场,本条旨在批判性地审查那些倾向于认为国家豁免与强制法规则之间存在冲突的论点,认为程序性规则和实质性规则之间的区别是人为的和形式主义的。此外,在涉及具有强制法规则地位的严重侵犯人权和国际人道主义法行为时,国家豁免具有相对性质。有必要对国家豁免领域的国家实践采取循序渐进的做法,考虑到国际法的当前发展和个人作为国际法主体的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
L’affaire des Immunités Juridictionnelles de l’Etat (Allemagne c. Italie): La Cour Internationale de Justice à contre-sens de l’évolution du Droit International
The purpose of this article is to assess the jurisdictional immunities of the State case before the International Court of Justice. In view of the position adopted by the majority of the members of the Court, the present article aims at critically examining the arguments that tend to consider that there is a conflict between State immunity and the rules of jus cogens, by arguing that the distinction between procedural and substantive rules is artificial and formalistic. In addition, State immunity is of a relative nature when serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, having the status of jus cogens rules, are concerned. It is necessary to carry out a progressive approach of State practice in the field of State immunities, which takes into account the current development of international law and the appearance of individuals as subjects of international law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: El Anuario es una publicación científica arbitrada que tiene como objetivo difundir, en Colombia y en el exterior, la producción de conocimiento sobre Derecho Internacional. Para ello, publica artículos inéditos en las áreas del Derecho Internacional Público, Derecho Internacional Privado, Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos, Derecho Internacional Económico y Arbitraje Internacional de Inversión escritos por investigadores nacionales y extranjeros. Su periodicidad es anual y el volumen del año correspondiente se publica en el mes de enero. Se reciben contribuciones en español, inglés, francés y portugués.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信