支持2019年平等法案:对伯特的评论

IF 1.8 2区社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Feminist Criminology Pub Date : 2021-01-27 DOI:10.1177/1557085121991336

S. Mezey

{"title":"支持2019年平等法案:对伯特的评论","authors":"S. Mezey","doi":"10.1177/1557085121991336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are three reason why I disagree with the author’s premise that 2019 Equality Act disadvantages women by blurring the distinction between sex and gender identity. First, it ignores current legal theory and practice that sex discrimination encompasses gender identity discrimination in federal law; second, it has not made a sufficient case that the Act’s interpretation of sex would harm women; third, it incorrectly assumes gender equality in the workplace can be achieved while sex-segregated spaces remain segregated by biological sex. In sum, revising the Equality Act to exempt women’s spaces would sacrifice the principle of gender equality upon which the Act is based.","PeriodicalId":51587,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Criminology","volume":"16 1","pages":"526 - 531"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1557085121991336","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Favor of the 2019 Equality Act: A Comment on Burt\",\"authors\":\"S. Mezey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1557085121991336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are three reason why I disagree with the author’s premise that 2019 Equality Act disadvantages women by blurring the distinction between sex and gender identity. First, it ignores current legal theory and practice that sex discrimination encompasses gender identity discrimination in federal law; second, it has not made a sufficient case that the Act’s interpretation of sex would harm women; third, it incorrectly assumes gender equality in the workplace can be achieved while sex-segregated spaces remain segregated by biological sex. In sum, revising the Equality Act to exempt women’s spaces would sacrifice the principle of gender equality upon which the Act is based.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Criminology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"526 - 531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1557085121991336\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085121991336\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085121991336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

我不同意作者的前提，即2019年平等法案模糊了性别和性别认同之间的区别，使女性处于不利地位，原因有三。首先，它忽略了当前的法律理论和实践，即性别歧视包括联邦法律中的性别认同歧视;其次，它没有充分证明该法对性的解释会伤害妇女;第三，它错误地假设工作场所的性别平等可以实现，而性别隔离的空间仍然被生理性别隔离。总而言之，修改《平等法》以豁免妇女空间将牺牲《平等法》所依据的性别平等原则。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

In Favor of the 2019 Equality Act: A Comment on Burt

There are three reason why I disagree with the author’s premise that 2019 Equality Act disadvantages women by blurring the distinction between sex and gender identity. First, it ignores current legal theory and practice that sex discrimination encompasses gender identity discrimination in federal law; second, it has not made a sufficient case that the Act’s interpretation of sex would harm women; third, it incorrectly assumes gender equality in the workplace can be achieved while sex-segregated spaces remain segregated by biological sex. In sum, revising the Equality Act to exempt women’s spaces would sacrifice the principle of gender equality upon which the Act is based.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Feminist Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

12.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The main aim of Feminist Criminology is to focus on research related to women, girls and crime. The scope includes research on women working in the criminal justice profession, women as offenders and how they are dealt with in the criminal justice system, women as victims, and theories and tests of theories related to women and crime. The feminist critique of criminology incorporates a perspective that the paths to crime differ for males and females, thus research that uses sex as a control variable often fails to illuminate the factors that predict female criminality. This journal will highlight research that takes a perspective designed to demonstrate the gendered nature of crime and responses to crime.