基于沃森性别标准的代数材料热点问题学生错误分析

Ayu Wulandari, W. Hadi
{"title":"基于沃森性别标准的代数材料热点问题学生错误分析","authors":"Ayu Wulandari, W. Hadi","doi":"10.26418/jpmipa.v14i1.55745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine what errors students made in working on algebraic Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) questions based on gender. This type of research method uses qualitative research methods. Data collection techniques in the form of essay test instruments, student interviews, and triangulation were used to test the validity of the data. This research was conducted on tenth-grade high school students in Jakarta by taking research subjects, namely those with high and low abilities. The results showed that the indicators of errors made by high-ability male students occurred in indicators of inaropriate procedures, errors other than the 7 criteria (not solving the problem), missing conclusions, and indirect manipulation. Meanwhile, women made mistakes on error indicators other than the 7 criteria (not solving the problem), incorrect procedures, and missing conclusions. As for the error indicator, the male student with low ability made an error on the error indicator other than the 7 criteria (not solving the problem), but the procedure indicator did not. Meanwhile, female students made mistakes on indicators other than the 7 criteria (not solving the problem), incorrect data, incorrect procedures, missing conclusions, indirect manipulation, and hierarchical problems.","PeriodicalId":31449,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSIS OF STUDENT ERRORS IN WORKING ON HOTS QUESTIONS FOR ALGEBRA MATERIALS ON WATSON’S CRITERIA BASED ON GENDER\",\"authors\":\"Ayu Wulandari, W. Hadi\",\"doi\":\"10.26418/jpmipa.v14i1.55745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine what errors students made in working on algebraic Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) questions based on gender. This type of research method uses qualitative research methods. Data collection techniques in the form of essay test instruments, student interviews, and triangulation were used to test the validity of the data. This research was conducted on tenth-grade high school students in Jakarta by taking research subjects, namely those with high and low abilities. The results showed that the indicators of errors made by high-ability male students occurred in indicators of inaropriate procedures, errors other than the 7 criteria (not solving the problem), missing conclusions, and indirect manipulation. Meanwhile, women made mistakes on error indicators other than the 7 criteria (not solving the problem), incorrect procedures, and missing conclusions. As for the error indicator, the male student with low ability made an error on the error indicator other than the 7 criteria (not solving the problem), but the procedure indicator did not. Meanwhile, female students made mistakes on indicators other than the 7 criteria (not solving the problem), incorrect data, incorrect procedures, missing conclusions, indirect manipulation, and hierarchical problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v14i1.55745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v14i1.55745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定学生在处理基于性别的代数高阶思维技能(HOTS)问题时犯了什么错误。这类研究方法采用定性研究方法。采用论文测试工具、学生访谈和三角测量等形式的数据收集技术来测试数据的有效性。这项研究是对雅加达十年级的高中生进行的,他们参加了研究科目,即高能力和低能力的学生。结果表明,高能力男生的错误指标出现在操作不当、7项标准以外的错误(未解决问题)、结论缺失和间接操纵等指标上。同时,妇女在7项标准以外的错误指标上犯了错误(没有解决问题),程序不正确,结论缺失。关于错误指标,能力低的男生在7项标准以外的错误指标上犯了错误(没有解决问题),但程序指标没有。同时,女学生在7项标准以外的指标上出现错误(没有解决问题)、数据不正确、程序不正确、结论缺失、间接操纵和等级问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALYSIS OF STUDENT ERRORS IN WORKING ON HOTS QUESTIONS FOR ALGEBRA MATERIALS ON WATSON’S CRITERIA BASED ON GENDER
This study aims to determine what errors students made in working on algebraic Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) questions based on gender. This type of research method uses qualitative research methods. Data collection techniques in the form of essay test instruments, student interviews, and triangulation were used to test the validity of the data. This research was conducted on tenth-grade high school students in Jakarta by taking research subjects, namely those with high and low abilities. The results showed that the indicators of errors made by high-ability male students occurred in indicators of inaropriate procedures, errors other than the 7 criteria (not solving the problem), missing conclusions, and indirect manipulation. Meanwhile, women made mistakes on error indicators other than the 7 criteria (not solving the problem), incorrect procedures, and missing conclusions. As for the error indicator, the male student with low ability made an error on the error indicator other than the 7 criteria (not solving the problem), but the procedure indicator did not. Meanwhile, female students made mistakes on indicators other than the 7 criteria (not solving the problem), incorrect data, incorrect procedures, missing conclusions, indirect manipulation, and hierarchical problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信