脑卒中后疼痛的神经调节治疗

Pain Research Pub Date : 2018-12-28 DOI:10.11154/PAIN.33.294
Takamitsu Yamamoto, Mitsuru Watanabe, Kazutaka Kobayashi, H. Oshima, C. Fukaya, A. Yoshino
{"title":"脑卒中后疼痛的神经调节治疗","authors":"Takamitsu Yamamoto, Mitsuru Watanabe, Kazutaka Kobayashi, H. Oshima, C. Fukaya, A. Yoshino","doi":"10.11154/PAIN.33.294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have reported that 5 Hz cervical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) increased cerebral blood flow and induced muscle twitches in the upper extremities, and minimally conscious state patients showed a remarkable recovery of consciousness and motor function in the upper extremities compared with that in the lower extremities. From the findings of our previous study, we have applied 5 Hz cervical SCS in combination with conventional 20 Hz cervical SCS to induce paresthesia over the painful area in poststroke pain patients. We report a new SCS technique for post– stroke pain and motor weakness. Twenty–two poststroke pain patients underwent pharmacological evaluation and dual–lead SCS trials or implantation. For the pharmacological evaluation, ketamine, morphine, and thiopental tests were carried out. Using a Touhy needle, a four or eight–contact flexible cylinder–type electrode was inserted into the epidural space of the cervical or thoracic vertebrae. The patients received 5 Hz cervical SCS to induce muscle twitches for five minutes in one session, and five sessions per day were carried out. In addition, patients underwent 20Hz cervical SCS to induce paresthesia as much as they required. During the 20 Hz SCS test period in the 22 patients, pain relief was estimated as excellent (≧60% VAS score reduction) in six patients, good (30 – 59% reduction) in nine patients, fair (10 – 29% reduction) in four patients, and poor (<10% reduction) in three patients. Three patients with poor estimated pain relief were not treated with chronic SCS. Twenty–four months after chronic SCS in 19 patients, pain relief was estimated as excellent in three patients, good in nine patients, and fair in seven patients. The %VAS score reduction 24 months after chronic SCS and the results of the ketamine test showed a significant correlation (r=0.670, p=0.001) by Pearson’s correlation coefficient test. However, the %VAS score reduction and the thiopental (r=0.291, p=0.227) and morphine (r=0.327, p=0.172) tests showed no significant cor relation. In patients treated with a combination of cervical 5 Hz and 20 Hz SCS, the motor function of the upper extremities recovered remarkably. The pharmacological evaluation of poststroke pain is a useful tool for the selection of candidates for SCS, and low–dose ketamine drop infusion method is useful for increasing the effect of SCS. The combination of 5 Hz and 20 Hz SCS is a new neuro-","PeriodicalId":41148,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromodulation therapy for post–stroke pain\",\"authors\":\"Takamitsu Yamamoto, Mitsuru Watanabe, Kazutaka Kobayashi, H. Oshima, C. Fukaya, A. Yoshino\",\"doi\":\"10.11154/PAIN.33.294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have reported that 5 Hz cervical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) increased cerebral blood flow and induced muscle twitches in the upper extremities, and minimally conscious state patients showed a remarkable recovery of consciousness and motor function in the upper extremities compared with that in the lower extremities. From the findings of our previous study, we have applied 5 Hz cervical SCS in combination with conventional 20 Hz cervical SCS to induce paresthesia over the painful area in poststroke pain patients. We report a new SCS technique for post– stroke pain and motor weakness. Twenty–two poststroke pain patients underwent pharmacological evaluation and dual–lead SCS trials or implantation. For the pharmacological evaluation, ketamine, morphine, and thiopental tests were carried out. Using a Touhy needle, a four or eight–contact flexible cylinder–type electrode was inserted into the epidural space of the cervical or thoracic vertebrae. The patients received 5 Hz cervical SCS to induce muscle twitches for five minutes in one session, and five sessions per day were carried out. In addition, patients underwent 20Hz cervical SCS to induce paresthesia as much as they required. During the 20 Hz SCS test period in the 22 patients, pain relief was estimated as excellent (≧60% VAS score reduction) in six patients, good (30 – 59% reduction) in nine patients, fair (10 – 29% reduction) in four patients, and poor (<10% reduction) in three patients. Three patients with poor estimated pain relief were not treated with chronic SCS. Twenty–four months after chronic SCS in 19 patients, pain relief was estimated as excellent in three patients, good in nine patients, and fair in seven patients. The %VAS score reduction 24 months after chronic SCS and the results of the ketamine test showed a significant correlation (r=0.670, p=0.001) by Pearson’s correlation coefficient test. However, the %VAS score reduction and the thiopental (r=0.291, p=0.227) and morphine (r=0.327, p=0.172) tests showed no significant cor relation. In patients treated with a combination of cervical 5 Hz and 20 Hz SCS, the motor function of the upper extremities recovered remarkably. The pharmacological evaluation of poststroke pain is a useful tool for the selection of candidates for SCS, and low–dose ketamine drop infusion method is useful for increasing the effect of SCS. The combination of 5 Hz and 20 Hz SCS is a new neuro-\",\"PeriodicalId\":41148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11154/PAIN.33.294\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11154/PAIN.33.294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据我们报道,5Hz颈脊髓刺激(SCS)增加了大脑血流量,并诱导了上肢肌肉抽搐,与下肢相比,轻度意识状态患者的上肢意识和运动功能显著恢复。根据我们之前的研究结果,我们已经将5 Hz的颈脊髓刺激与传统的20 Hz的颈神经刺激相结合,在卒中后疼痛患者的疼痛区域诱导感觉异常。我们报道了一种治疗中风后疼痛和运动无力的新SCS技术。22名卒中后疼痛患者接受了药物评估和双导联脊髓刺激系统试验或植入。为了进行药理学评价,进行了氯胺酮、吗啡和硫喷妥钠试验。使用Touhy针,将四或八触点柔性圆柱形电极插入颈椎或胸椎的硬膜外间隙。患者接受5 Hz的颈脊髓刺激,在一次治疗中诱导肌肉抽搐5分钟,每天进行5次治疗。此外,患者接受了20Hz的颈部脊髓刺激,以根据需要诱发感觉异常。在22名患者的20 Hz SCS测试期间,6名患者的疼痛缓解被评估为优秀(VAS评分降低≥60%),9名患者的良好(降低30-59%),4名患者的尚可(降低10-29%),3名患者的较差(降低<10%)。三名估计疼痛缓解不佳的患者未接受慢性脊髓刺激治疗。19名患者在慢性脊髓刺激24个月后,疼痛缓解估计为3名患者疼痛缓解良好,9名患者疼痛减轻良好,7名患者疼痛尚可。通过Pearson相关系数检验,慢性脊髓刺激后24个月VAS评分的%降低与氯胺酮测试结果显示出显著相关性(r=0.670,p=0.001)。然而,%VAS评分降低与硫喷妥钠(r=0.291,p=0.227)和吗啡(r=0.327,p=0.172)测试无显著相关性。在接受5赫兹和20赫兹脊髓刺激联合治疗的患者中,上肢运动功能显著恢复。卒中后疼痛的药理学评估是选择脊髓刺激候选药物的有用工具,低剂量氯胺酮滴注法有助于提高脊髓刺激的效果。5 Hz和20 Hz SCS的组合是一种新的神经-
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuromodulation therapy for post–stroke pain
We have reported that 5 Hz cervical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) increased cerebral blood flow and induced muscle twitches in the upper extremities, and minimally conscious state patients showed a remarkable recovery of consciousness and motor function in the upper extremities compared with that in the lower extremities. From the findings of our previous study, we have applied 5 Hz cervical SCS in combination with conventional 20 Hz cervical SCS to induce paresthesia over the painful area in poststroke pain patients. We report a new SCS technique for post– stroke pain and motor weakness. Twenty–two poststroke pain patients underwent pharmacological evaluation and dual–lead SCS trials or implantation. For the pharmacological evaluation, ketamine, morphine, and thiopental tests were carried out. Using a Touhy needle, a four or eight–contact flexible cylinder–type electrode was inserted into the epidural space of the cervical or thoracic vertebrae. The patients received 5 Hz cervical SCS to induce muscle twitches for five minutes in one session, and five sessions per day were carried out. In addition, patients underwent 20Hz cervical SCS to induce paresthesia as much as they required. During the 20 Hz SCS test period in the 22 patients, pain relief was estimated as excellent (≧60% VAS score reduction) in six patients, good (30 – 59% reduction) in nine patients, fair (10 – 29% reduction) in four patients, and poor (<10% reduction) in three patients. Three patients with poor estimated pain relief were not treated with chronic SCS. Twenty–four months after chronic SCS in 19 patients, pain relief was estimated as excellent in three patients, good in nine patients, and fair in seven patients. The %VAS score reduction 24 months after chronic SCS and the results of the ketamine test showed a significant correlation (r=0.670, p=0.001) by Pearson’s correlation coefficient test. However, the %VAS score reduction and the thiopental (r=0.291, p=0.227) and morphine (r=0.327, p=0.172) tests showed no significant cor relation. In patients treated with a combination of cervical 5 Hz and 20 Hz SCS, the motor function of the upper extremities recovered remarkably. The pharmacological evaluation of poststroke pain is a useful tool for the selection of candidates for SCS, and low–dose ketamine drop infusion method is useful for increasing the effect of SCS. The combination of 5 Hz and 20 Hz SCS is a new neuro-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research
Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信