慢性伤口生物膜的发生和持续:一项大型多中心临床研究

Q1 Medicine
Fromantin Isabelle , Seyer Damien , Rollot Florence , Meaume Sylvie , Chauty Annick , Diallo Alhassane , Escande Marie Christine , Teot Luc , Larreta Garde Véronique
{"title":"慢性伤口生物膜的发生和持续:一项大型多中心临床研究","authors":"Fromantin Isabelle ,&nbsp;Seyer Damien ,&nbsp;Rollot Florence ,&nbsp;Meaume Sylvie ,&nbsp;Chauty Annick ,&nbsp;Diallo Alhassane ,&nbsp;Escande Marie Christine ,&nbsp;Teot Luc ,&nbsp;Larreta Garde Véronique","doi":"10.1016/j.wndm.2018.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The prevalence of biofilms on chronic wounds is difficult to evaluate and the clinical diagnosis of biofilm remains essentially based on expert opinions. While all previous studies converge towards the proof that biofilm presence on non-healing chronic wounds is the general case, no study reports its occurrence on cared wounds after including anti-biofilm treatment. This prospective and observational study is devoted to evaluating the presence of biofilm on cared human chronic wound samples.</p></div><div><h3>M&amp;M</h3><p><span>A prospective cohort study of &gt; 100 patients with chronic wounds (duration &gt; 6 weeks) was conducted over 2 years in 4 centers. Samplings were realized in the deepest and/or most necrotic zone of the wound after cleansing. </span>Fluorescence microscopy technique was used to demonstrate the evidence of biofilms in wound samples.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Biofilms were identified on 23% of cleansed wounds.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This large difference from the previous studies found in the literature which report 60% of biofilms on chronic wounds could be explained by the inclusion criteria and sampling procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38278,"journal":{"name":"Wound Medicine","volume":"23 ","pages":"Pages 28-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wndm.2018.09.008","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occurrence and persistence of biofilms on cared chronic wounds: A large multicentric clinical study\",\"authors\":\"Fromantin Isabelle ,&nbsp;Seyer Damien ,&nbsp;Rollot Florence ,&nbsp;Meaume Sylvie ,&nbsp;Chauty Annick ,&nbsp;Diallo Alhassane ,&nbsp;Escande Marie Christine ,&nbsp;Teot Luc ,&nbsp;Larreta Garde Véronique\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wndm.2018.09.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The prevalence of biofilms on chronic wounds is difficult to evaluate and the clinical diagnosis of biofilm remains essentially based on expert opinions. While all previous studies converge towards the proof that biofilm presence on non-healing chronic wounds is the general case, no study reports its occurrence on cared wounds after including anti-biofilm treatment. This prospective and observational study is devoted to evaluating the presence of biofilm on cared human chronic wound samples.</p></div><div><h3>M&amp;M</h3><p><span>A prospective cohort study of &gt; 100 patients with chronic wounds (duration &gt; 6 weeks) was conducted over 2 years in 4 centers. Samplings were realized in the deepest and/or most necrotic zone of the wound after cleansing. </span>Fluorescence microscopy technique was used to demonstrate the evidence of biofilms in wound samples.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Biofilms were identified on 23% of cleansed wounds.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This large difference from the previous studies found in the literature which report 60% of biofilms on chronic wounds could be explained by the inclusion criteria and sampling procedures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wound Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 28-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wndm.2018.09.008\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wound Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213909518300375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213909518300375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

生物膜在慢性伤口中的流行程度难以评估,临床对生物膜的诊断基本上是基于专家的意见。虽然以往的研究都倾向于证明生物膜在未愈合的慢性伤口上的存在是一般情况,但没有研究报道在包括抗生物膜治疗的护理伤口上出现生物膜的情况。这项前瞻性和观察性研究致力于评估生物膜在人类慢性伤口样本中的存在。m&MA前瞻性队列研究> 100例慢性伤口患者(持续时间 > 6周)在4个中心进行了为期2年的研究。在清洗后伤口最深和/或最坏死的区域进行取样。荧光显微镜技术用于证明伤口样品中生物膜的证据。结果23%的创面有生物膜。这与先前文献中发现的60%的慢性伤口生物膜的研究有很大的差异,这可以通过纳入标准和抽样程序来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occurrence and persistence of biofilms on cared chronic wounds: A large multicentric clinical study

Introduction

The prevalence of biofilms on chronic wounds is difficult to evaluate and the clinical diagnosis of biofilm remains essentially based on expert opinions. While all previous studies converge towards the proof that biofilm presence on non-healing chronic wounds is the general case, no study reports its occurrence on cared wounds after including anti-biofilm treatment. This prospective and observational study is devoted to evaluating the presence of biofilm on cared human chronic wound samples.

M&M

A prospective cohort study of > 100 patients with chronic wounds (duration > 6 weeks) was conducted over 2 years in 4 centers. Samplings were realized in the deepest and/or most necrotic zone of the wound after cleansing. Fluorescence microscopy technique was used to demonstrate the evidence of biofilms in wound samples.

Results

Biofilms were identified on 23% of cleansed wounds.

Discussion

This large difference from the previous studies found in the literature which report 60% of biofilms on chronic wounds could be explained by the inclusion criteria and sampling procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wound Medicine
Wound Medicine Medicine-Surgery
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信