门诊病人和住院病人的手术室规划与调度:回顾与未来研究

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lien Wang , Erik Demeulemeester , Nancy Vansteenkiste , Frank E. Rademakers
{"title":"门诊病人和住院病人的手术室规划与调度:回顾与未来研究","authors":"Lien Wang ,&nbsp;Erik Demeulemeester ,&nbsp;Nancy Vansteenkiste ,&nbsp;Frank E. Rademakers","doi":"10.1016/j.orhc.2021.100323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In hospitals, surgeries are treated either on an outpatient or on an inpatient basis. Outpatients are normally routine patients that enter and leave the hospital on the same day, while inpatients who need more complex surgeries have to stay overnight. More recently, a shift from inpatient surgery to outpatient surgery is occurring due to scientific progress in anaesthesia and surgical techniques. Identifying possible similarities and differences between outpatient surgery scheduling and inpatient surgery scheduling can serve as a valuable decision-making foundation for practitioners and for operations researchers to efficiently schedule patients for surgery in the surgical department. This paper provides the first literature review on comparing outpatient surgery scheduling with inpatient surgery scheduling. The literature published between 2000 and 2020 that explicitly mentions either scheduling setting is included and it is analyzed from three dimensions, i.e., the uncertainty incorporation, the research methodology, and a scheduling performance comparison between both settings. We find that outpatient surgery can observe better results in many of the performance measures (i.e., operating room utilization, overtime, and patient cancellation rate) as opposed to inpatient surgery. This is due to the fact that inpatient surgery duration is longer and more variable and to the presence of more emergency patients, although there is a higher likelihood of no-shows for outpatients. Moreover, we identify future research directions that provide opportunities for expanding existing methodologies and especially for narrowing the gap between theory and practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46320,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research for Health Care","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100323"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operating room planning and scheduling for outpatients and inpatients: A review and future research\",\"authors\":\"Lien Wang ,&nbsp;Erik Demeulemeester ,&nbsp;Nancy Vansteenkiste ,&nbsp;Frank E. Rademakers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orhc.2021.100323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In hospitals, surgeries are treated either on an outpatient or on an inpatient basis. Outpatients are normally routine patients that enter and leave the hospital on the same day, while inpatients who need more complex surgeries have to stay overnight. More recently, a shift from inpatient surgery to outpatient surgery is occurring due to scientific progress in anaesthesia and surgical techniques. Identifying possible similarities and differences between outpatient surgery scheduling and inpatient surgery scheduling can serve as a valuable decision-making foundation for practitioners and for operations researchers to efficiently schedule patients for surgery in the surgical department. This paper provides the first literature review on comparing outpatient surgery scheduling with inpatient surgery scheduling. The literature published between 2000 and 2020 that explicitly mentions either scheduling setting is included and it is analyzed from three dimensions, i.e., the uncertainty incorporation, the research methodology, and a scheduling performance comparison between both settings. We find that outpatient surgery can observe better results in many of the performance measures (i.e., operating room utilization, overtime, and patient cancellation rate) as opposed to inpatient surgery. This is due to the fact that inpatient surgery duration is longer and more variable and to the presence of more emergency patients, although there is a higher likelihood of no-shows for outpatients. Moreover, we identify future research directions that provide opportunities for expanding existing methodologies and especially for narrowing the gap between theory and practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operations Research for Health Care\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operations Research for Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692321000394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research for Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692321000394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在医院,手术要么在门诊进行,要么在住院进行。门诊病人通常是同一天入院和出院的常规病人,而需要更复杂手术的住院病人则必须过夜。最近,由于麻醉和外科技术的科学进步,从住院手术到门诊手术的转变正在发生。识别门诊手术安排与住院手术安排之间可能存在的异同,可以为外科医生和手术研究者有效安排患者手术提供有价值的决策基础。本文首次对门诊手术安排与住院手术安排的比较进行文献综述。纳入2000年至2020年间发表的明确提及任何一种调度设置的文献,并从不确定性纳入、研究方法和两种调度设置之间的调度性能比较三个维度进行分析。我们发现,与住院手术相比,门诊手术在许多绩效指标(即手术室利用率、加班时间和病人取消率)上都能观察到更好的结果。这是由于住院病人的手术时间更长,变化更大,而且急诊病人更多,尽管门诊病人不来的可能性更高。此外,我们确定了未来的研究方向,为扩展现有方法,特别是缩小理论与实践之间的差距提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Operating room planning and scheduling for outpatients and inpatients: A review and future research

In hospitals, surgeries are treated either on an outpatient or on an inpatient basis. Outpatients are normally routine patients that enter and leave the hospital on the same day, while inpatients who need more complex surgeries have to stay overnight. More recently, a shift from inpatient surgery to outpatient surgery is occurring due to scientific progress in anaesthesia and surgical techniques. Identifying possible similarities and differences between outpatient surgery scheduling and inpatient surgery scheduling can serve as a valuable decision-making foundation for practitioners and for operations researchers to efficiently schedule patients for surgery in the surgical department. This paper provides the first literature review on comparing outpatient surgery scheduling with inpatient surgery scheduling. The literature published between 2000 and 2020 that explicitly mentions either scheduling setting is included and it is analyzed from three dimensions, i.e., the uncertainty incorporation, the research methodology, and a scheduling performance comparison between both settings. We find that outpatient surgery can observe better results in many of the performance measures (i.e., operating room utilization, overtime, and patient cancellation rate) as opposed to inpatient surgery. This is due to the fact that inpatient surgery duration is longer and more variable and to the presence of more emergency patients, although there is a higher likelihood of no-shows for outpatients. Moreover, we identify future research directions that provide opportunities for expanding existing methodologies and especially for narrowing the gap between theory and practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research for Health Care
Operations Research for Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信