监控与隐私作为共同进化的干扰:对“注意与选择”的反思

IF 3.1 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Andrew B. Whitford, Jeff Yates
{"title":"监控与隐私作为共同进化的干扰:对“注意与选择”的反思","authors":"Andrew B. Whitford, Jeff Yates","doi":"10.1080/25741292.2022.2086667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The last two decades have seen a dramatic rise in the ways governments, private industry, and other interests can access, gather, analyze, and employ information about citizens. Given the unique roles of practitioners from both the public and private sectors in this policy ecosystem, we lay conceptual groundwork for coevolving technological, business, and policy disruptions. We focus on the “notice and choice” framework (which we consider a type of nudge) given changing conceptions of privacy in a world of evolving norms. Finally, we consider the difficult problem of clear guideposts for policy actors as they try to reconcile public demands for privacy with competing interests.","PeriodicalId":20397,"journal":{"name":"Policy Design and Practice","volume":"6 1","pages":"14 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surveillance and privacy as coevolving disruptions: reflections on “notice and choice”\",\"authors\":\"Andrew B. Whitford, Jeff Yates\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25741292.2022.2086667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The last two decades have seen a dramatic rise in the ways governments, private industry, and other interests can access, gather, analyze, and employ information about citizens. Given the unique roles of practitioners from both the public and private sectors in this policy ecosystem, we lay conceptual groundwork for coevolving technological, business, and policy disruptions. We focus on the “notice and choice” framework (which we consider a type of nudge) given changing conceptions of privacy in a world of evolving norms. Finally, we consider the difficult problem of clear guideposts for policy actors as they try to reconcile public demands for privacy with competing interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy Design and Practice\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"14 - 26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy Design and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2022.2086667\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Design and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2022.2086667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在过去的二十年里,政府、私营企业和其他利益集团获取、收集、分析和使用公民信息的方式急剧增加。鉴于公共和私营部门从业者在这一政策生态系统中的独特作用,我们为共同参与技术、商业和政策破坏奠定了概念基础。鉴于在一个不断发展的规范世界中隐私概念的变化,我们专注于“通知和选择”框架(我们认为这是一种推动)。最后,我们考虑了政策行为者在试图调和公众对隐私的要求与相互竞争的利益时,明确指导方针的难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surveillance and privacy as coevolving disruptions: reflections on “notice and choice”
Abstract The last two decades have seen a dramatic rise in the ways governments, private industry, and other interests can access, gather, analyze, and employ information about citizens. Given the unique roles of practitioners from both the public and private sectors in this policy ecosystem, we lay conceptual groundwork for coevolving technological, business, and policy disruptions. We focus on the “notice and choice” framework (which we consider a type of nudge) given changing conceptions of privacy in a world of evolving norms. Finally, we consider the difficult problem of clear guideposts for policy actors as they try to reconcile public demands for privacy with competing interests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policy Design and Practice
Policy Design and Practice PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信