墙壁、桥梁和时间褶皱:史诗、帝国和新古典主义重访

Q4 Social Sciences

Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture Pub Date : 2022-03-29 DOI:10.1353/sec.2022.0016

Charlotte Sussman

{"title":"墙壁、桥梁和时间褶皱:史诗、帝国和新古典主义重访","authors":"Charlotte Sussman","doi":"10.1353/sec.2022.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay focuses on Daniel O’Quinn’s argument that Lady Mary Wortley Montagu’s letter book can be read as a “counter-epic.” Comparing O’Quinn’s approach to other influential accounts of the role of epic in eighteenth-century literature, it explores how translations of and allusions to Virgil’s Aeneid shape the ways in which intercultural contact can be represented and understood.","PeriodicalId":39439,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Walls, Bridges, and Temporal Folds: Epic, Empire, and Neoclassicism Revisited\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Sussman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sec.2022.0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay focuses on Daniel O’Quinn’s argument that Lady Mary Wortley Montagu’s letter book can be read as a “counter-epic.” Comparing O’Quinn’s approach to other influential accounts of the role of epic in eighteenth-century literature, it explores how translations of and allusions to Virgil’s Aeneid shape the ways in which intercultural contact can be represented and understood.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sec.2022.0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sec.2022.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文主要探讨丹尼尔·奥奎因认为玛丽·沃特利·蒙塔古夫人的书信集可以被解读为一部“反史诗”。将奥奎因的方法与其他有影响力的关于史诗在18世纪文学中的作用的描述进行比较，探讨了维吉尔的《埃涅伊德》的翻译和典故如何塑造了跨文化接触的表现和理解方式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

On Walls, Bridges, and Temporal Folds: Epic, Empire, and Neoclassicism Revisited

Abstract:This essay focuses on Daniel O’Quinn’s argument that Lady Mary Wortley Montagu’s letter book can be read as a “counter-epic.” Comparing O’Quinn’s approach to other influential accounts of the role of epic in eighteenth-century literature, it explores how translations of and allusions to Virgil’s Aeneid shape the ways in which intercultural contact can be represented and understood.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Society sponsors two publications that make available today’s best interdisciplinary work: the quarterly journal Eighteenth-Century Studies and the annual volume Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture. In addition, the Society distributes a newsletter and the teaching pamphlet and innovative course design proposals are published on the website. The annual volume of SECC is available to members at a reduced cost; all other publications are included with membership.