内化的种族主义是起诉中种族差异的又一块谜团吗?

IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
B. Kutateladze, Lin Liu
{"title":"内化的种族主义是起诉中种族差异的又一块谜团吗?","authors":"B. Kutateladze, Lin Liu","doi":"10.1080/07418825.2022.2125048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although diversifying the criminal justice apparatus may yield more equitable outcomes, empirical tests of how prosecutors’ race affects their decisions are limited. Informed by Internalized Racism Theory (IRT), we hypothesized that Black prosecutors would be most punitive toward Black defendants, followed by Latino/a defendants, and least toward White and Asian defendants. Employing hierarchical logistic modelling, we analyzed data from a large prosecutorial office to examine the extent to which prosecutors’ race is associated with racial disparities in custodial plea offers and charge reductions. We found notable support for our hypotheses. In cases disposed of by Black prosecutors, Black and Latino/defendants are significantly more likely to receive custodial plea offers than are similarly-situated White and Asian defendants. Although the direction of the relationship with charge reductions was in line with our hypotheses, no significant effects were detected.","PeriodicalId":48233,"journal":{"name":"Justice Quarterly","volume":"40 1","pages":"725 - 743"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Internalized Racism One More Piece of the Puzzle in Racial Disparities in Prosecution?\",\"authors\":\"B. Kutateladze, Lin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07418825.2022.2125048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Although diversifying the criminal justice apparatus may yield more equitable outcomes, empirical tests of how prosecutors’ race affects their decisions are limited. Informed by Internalized Racism Theory (IRT), we hypothesized that Black prosecutors would be most punitive toward Black defendants, followed by Latino/a defendants, and least toward White and Asian defendants. Employing hierarchical logistic modelling, we analyzed data from a large prosecutorial office to examine the extent to which prosecutors’ race is associated with racial disparities in custodial plea offers and charge reductions. We found notable support for our hypotheses. In cases disposed of by Black prosecutors, Black and Latino/defendants are significantly more likely to receive custodial plea offers than are similarly-situated White and Asian defendants. Although the direction of the relationship with charge reductions was in line with our hypotheses, no significant effects were detected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Justice Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"725 - 743\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Justice Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2022.2125048\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justice Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2022.2125048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要尽管刑事司法机构的多样化可能会产生更公平的结果,但对检察官种族如何影响其决策的实证检验是有限的。根据内部种族主义理论(IRT),我们假设黑人检察官对黑人被告的惩罚最大,其次是拉丁裔被告,对白人和亚裔被告的惩罚最小。采用分层逻辑模型,我们分析了一个大型检察官办公室的数据,以检验检察官的种族在多大程度上与监禁认罪和减少指控中的种族差异有关。我们发现我们的假设得到了显著的支持。在黑人检察官处理的案件中,黑人和拉丁裔/被告比处境相似的白人和亚裔被告更有可能获得监禁抗辩。尽管与电荷减少的关系方向与我们的假设一致,但没有检测到显著的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Internalized Racism One More Piece of the Puzzle in Racial Disparities in Prosecution?
Abstract Although diversifying the criminal justice apparatus may yield more equitable outcomes, empirical tests of how prosecutors’ race affects their decisions are limited. Informed by Internalized Racism Theory (IRT), we hypothesized that Black prosecutors would be most punitive toward Black defendants, followed by Latino/a defendants, and least toward White and Asian defendants. Employing hierarchical logistic modelling, we analyzed data from a large prosecutorial office to examine the extent to which prosecutors’ race is associated with racial disparities in custodial plea offers and charge reductions. We found notable support for our hypotheses. In cases disposed of by Black prosecutors, Black and Latino/defendants are significantly more likely to receive custodial plea offers than are similarly-situated White and Asian defendants. Although the direction of the relationship with charge reductions was in line with our hypotheses, no significant effects were detected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Justice Quarterly
Justice Quarterly CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Justice Quarterly (JQ) is an official publication of the ACJS. JQ is a refereed, multi-disciplinary journal that publishes theoretical, empirical and interpretive studies of issues related to criminal justice. JQ is indexed in Criminology and Penology Abstracts, Police Science Abstracts, Criminal Justice Periodical Index, and Criminal Justice Abstracts. In the past decade, JQ has become a premier journal and it continues to be a major forum for criminal justice related scholarship, making it an essential part of any library"s holdings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信