在坦桑尼亚大陆,阻碍夫妇进入婚姻调解委员会的因素

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW
Janeth Alphonce, C. Binamungu, Seraphine M Bakta
{"title":"在坦桑尼亚大陆,阻碍夫妇进入婚姻调解委员会的因素","authors":"Janeth Alphonce, C. Binamungu, Seraphine M Bakta","doi":"10.1017/S0021855322000201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract To safeguard marriage, the Law of Marriage Act of Mainland Tanzania, established marriage conciliation boards (MCBs) to reconcile disputing spouses. Divorce cases are referred to MCBs before they are filed in court. The divorce rate in Mainland Tanzania is increasing and case law indicates that some parties are by-passing MCBs without good cause. The authors were motivated to study the causes of this trend. Data were collected in Morogoro and Kilimanjaro regions through documentary review and in-depth interviews. They identified six factors limiting parties’ access to MCBs: set-up of the boards; MCBs’ regulatory framework; jurisdiction; costs; choice of forum; and inadequate provisions governing the process followed by MCBs. The study concluded that the government attaches minimal significance to MCBs and recommends that the government should intervene, including by reforming the law governing MCBs.","PeriodicalId":44630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Law","volume":"66 1","pages":"439 - 464"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Hindering Couples from Accessing Marriage Conciliation Boards in Mainland Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Janeth Alphonce, C. Binamungu, Seraphine M Bakta\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0021855322000201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract To safeguard marriage, the Law of Marriage Act of Mainland Tanzania, established marriage conciliation boards (MCBs) to reconcile disputing spouses. Divorce cases are referred to MCBs before they are filed in court. The divorce rate in Mainland Tanzania is increasing and case law indicates that some parties are by-passing MCBs without good cause. The authors were motivated to study the causes of this trend. Data were collected in Morogoro and Kilimanjaro regions through documentary review and in-depth interviews. They identified six factors limiting parties’ access to MCBs: set-up of the boards; MCBs’ regulatory framework; jurisdiction; costs; choice of forum; and inadequate provisions governing the process followed by MCBs. The study concluded that the government attaches minimal significance to MCBs and recommends that the government should intervene, including by reforming the law governing MCBs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of African Law\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"439 - 464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of African Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855322000201\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855322000201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要坦桑尼亚大陆的《婚姻法》为保障婚姻,设立了婚姻调解委员会(marriage reconciliation boards, mcb)来调解夫妻纠纷。离婚案件在提交法庭之前被提交给mcb。坦桑尼亚大陆的离婚率正在上升,判例法表明,一些当事人在没有充分理由的情况下绕过mcb。作者们有动机去研究这一趋势的原因。通过文献审查和深度访谈,在莫罗戈罗和乞力马扎罗山地区收集数据。他们确定了六个限制各方进入mcb的因素:董事会的设置;MCBs的监管框架;管辖;成本;论坛选择;管理mcb遵循的程序的规定不充分。该研究得出的结论是,政府对mcb的重视程度最低,并建议政府进行干预,包括改革管理mcb的法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Hindering Couples from Accessing Marriage Conciliation Boards in Mainland Tanzania
Abstract To safeguard marriage, the Law of Marriage Act of Mainland Tanzania, established marriage conciliation boards (MCBs) to reconcile disputing spouses. Divorce cases are referred to MCBs before they are filed in court. The divorce rate in Mainland Tanzania is increasing and case law indicates that some parties are by-passing MCBs without good cause. The authors were motivated to study the causes of this trend. Data were collected in Morogoro and Kilimanjaro regions through documentary review and in-depth interviews. They identified six factors limiting parties’ access to MCBs: set-up of the boards; MCBs’ regulatory framework; jurisdiction; costs; choice of forum; and inadequate provisions governing the process followed by MCBs. The study concluded that the government attaches minimal significance to MCBs and recommends that the government should intervene, including by reforming the law governing MCBs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信