新常态下网络补习教学培训方案评价

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Elizabeth W. Santos
{"title":"新常态下网络补习教学培训方案评价","authors":"Elizabeth W. Santos","doi":"10.47750/jett.2023.14.02.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Program evaluation is important in determining the effectiveness and efficiency of the conducted training. The study evaluated the training on the online remedial instruction in the new normal via Google meet and streamed through Facebook using the Kirkpatrick’s Model, which consisted of four levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and result. Each of the four levels was evaluated. The model was used to evaluate five training programs on remedial instruction in literacy and numeracy of the Literacy Training Service students based from their perspectives, who will conduct remedial instruction online or face to face in one-to-one tuition. A convergent parallel mixed method research design was utilized. There were 300 key informants who evaluated the training. They were chosen using the stratified random sampling technique. For the focus group discussion, 30 key informants were purposively selected and grouped into three. The results revealed that the key informants were extremely satisfied with the conducted training. The training made them love the teaching profession, discover different techniques, improve their teaching pedagogy, character, and communication skills, prepared them for their future career, and learn different instructional materials. The result of the training program is very commendable, that is why it is recommended that the same training program should be given to the students of Literacy Training Service (LTS) before they will be allowed to give remedial instruction.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of the Training Program on Online Remedial Instruction in the New Normal\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth W. Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.47750/jett.2023.14.02.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Program evaluation is important in determining the effectiveness and efficiency of the conducted training. The study evaluated the training on the online remedial instruction in the new normal via Google meet and streamed through Facebook using the Kirkpatrick’s Model, which consisted of four levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and result. Each of the four levels was evaluated. The model was used to evaluate five training programs on remedial instruction in literacy and numeracy of the Literacy Training Service students based from their perspectives, who will conduct remedial instruction online or face to face in one-to-one tuition. A convergent parallel mixed method research design was utilized. There were 300 key informants who evaluated the training. They were chosen using the stratified random sampling technique. For the focus group discussion, 30 key informants were purposively selected and grouped into three. The results revealed that the key informants were extremely satisfied with the conducted training. The training made them love the teaching profession, discover different techniques, improve their teaching pedagogy, character, and communication skills, prepared them for their future career, and learn different instructional materials. The result of the training program is very commendable, that is why it is recommended that the same training program should be given to the students of Literacy Training Service (LTS) before they will be allowed to give remedial instruction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2023.14.02.030\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2023.14.02.030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

项目评估对于确定培训的有效性和效率非常重要。该研究通过谷歌会议评估了新常态下在线补救指导的培训,并使用柯克帕特里克模型在脸书上进行了流式传输,该模型由四个层面组成:反应、学习、行为和结果。对四个级别中的每一个进行了评估。该模型用于从识字培训服务学生的角度评估五个关于识字和算术辅导的培训项目,这些学生将在线或面对面进行一对一辅导。采用了一种收敛的并行混合方法研究设计。有300名关键线人对培训进行了评估。他们是使用分层随机抽样技术选择的。在焦点小组讨论中,有目的地选择了30名关键线人,并将其分为三组。结果显示,关键线人对所进行的培训非常满意。培训使他们热爱教师职业,发现不同的技术,提高教学法、性格和沟通技能,为未来的职业生涯做好准备,并学习不同的教学材料。培训计划的结果非常值得称赞,这就是为什么建议在允许识字培训服务(LTS)的学生进行补救指导之前,应向他们提供相同的培训计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Evaluation of the Training Program on Online Remedial Instruction in the New Normal
Program evaluation is important in determining the effectiveness and efficiency of the conducted training. The study evaluated the training on the online remedial instruction in the new normal via Google meet and streamed through Facebook using the Kirkpatrick’s Model, which consisted of four levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and result. Each of the four levels was evaluated. The model was used to evaluate five training programs on remedial instruction in literacy and numeracy of the Literacy Training Service students based from their perspectives, who will conduct remedial instruction online or face to face in one-to-one tuition. A convergent parallel mixed method research design was utilized. There were 300 key informants who evaluated the training. They were chosen using the stratified random sampling technique. For the focus group discussion, 30 key informants were purposively selected and grouped into three. The results revealed that the key informants were extremely satisfied with the conducted training. The training made them love the teaching profession, discover different techniques, improve their teaching pedagogy, character, and communication skills, prepared them for their future career, and learn different instructional materials. The result of the training program is very commendable, that is why it is recommended that the same training program should be given to the students of Literacy Training Service (LTS) before they will be allowed to give remedial instruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信