欧洲法院与《公社法》的一般原则

Q2 Social Sciences
Oslo Law Review Pub Date : 2017-03-07 DOI:10.5617/OSLAW980
Élise Poillot
{"title":"欧洲法院与《公社法》的一般原则","authors":"Élise Poillot","doi":"10.5617/OSLAW980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to demonstrate and identify principles derived from primary legislation which govern European contract law. This demonstration is based on the consubstantial relationship, rooted in a market-oriented conception of Europe, which exists between principles set up by the European Union Treaties and those implicitly contained in secondary legislation. However, the view taken here is that not all ‘primary principles’ are shaped to integrate secondary legislation dealing with contract law. Only proportionality, effectiveness and, to some extent,non-discrimination prove appropriate in the context of contract law. The first part of the article supports the view that these principles have been used to remedy limits in European legislature competences in contract law. Part two takes the view that the principles have been used by the European Court of Justice as a tool of contractual policy making.","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"67-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The European Court of Justice and General Principles Derived from the Acquis Communautaire\",\"authors\":\"Élise Poillot\",\"doi\":\"10.5617/OSLAW980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to demonstrate and identify principles derived from primary legislation which govern European contract law. This demonstration is based on the consubstantial relationship, rooted in a market-oriented conception of Europe, which exists between principles set up by the European Union Treaties and those implicitly contained in secondary legislation. However, the view taken here is that not all ‘primary principles’ are shaped to integrate secondary legislation dealing with contract law. Only proportionality, effectiveness and, to some extent,non-discrimination prove appropriate in the context of contract law. The first part of the article supports the view that these principles have been used to remedy limits in European legislature competences in contract law. Part two takes the view that the principles have been used by the European Court of Justice as a tool of contractual policy making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oslo Law Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"67-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oslo Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5617/OSLAW980\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oslo Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5617/OSLAW980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文旨在论证和确定源自欧洲合同法主要立法的原则。这一论证是建立在以市场为导向的欧洲概念的基础上的,这种关系存在于《欧洲联盟条约》确立的原则和二级立法隐含的原则之间。然而,这里的观点是,并非所有的“主要原则”都是为了整合处理合同法的次要立法而制定的。在合同法的范围内,只有相称性、有效性以及在某种程度上的不歧视才是合适的。文章的第一部分支持这样一种观点,即这些原则已被用来弥补欧洲立法机构在合同法中的权限限制。第二部分认为,欧洲法院已将这些原则作为制定合同政策的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The European Court of Justice and General Principles Derived from the Acquis Communautaire
This article aims to demonstrate and identify principles derived from primary legislation which govern European contract law. This demonstration is based on the consubstantial relationship, rooted in a market-oriented conception of Europe, which exists between principles set up by the European Union Treaties and those implicitly contained in secondary legislation. However, the view taken here is that not all ‘primary principles’ are shaped to integrate secondary legislation dealing with contract law. Only proportionality, effectiveness and, to some extent,non-discrimination prove appropriate in the context of contract law. The first part of the article supports the view that these principles have been used to remedy limits in European legislature competences in contract law. Part two takes the view that the principles have been used by the European Court of Justice as a tool of contractual policy making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oslo Law Review
Oslo Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信