残疾人全纳教育、发展与辩证法:不丹的复杂案例

IF 2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
C. Johnstone, Matthew J. Schuelka, Yeshi Choeki, T. Yetsho
{"title":"残疾人全纳教育、发展与辩证法:不丹的复杂案例","authors":"C. Johnstone, Matthew J. Schuelka, Yeshi Choeki, T. Yetsho","doi":"10.1086/722814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disability-inclusive education and development have become priorities for global governance organizations over the past decade and have thus introduced new complexities to existing development narratives. One reason for this is the long-standing discourse of “disability models” (medical, social, and cultural models) most often found in disability studies discourses. This study demonstrates that individuals with disabilities and their advocates navigate education and development opportunities through the lens of multiple models simultaneously. In this article, we introduce the philosophical theory of dialectics as a way of understanding how seemingly competing models might simultaneously inform the actions that individuals take in relation to disability-inclusive education and development. We present three minicases—two from teachers and one from a youth with a disability—drawn from a recent 3-year project in Bhutan. These case examples demonstrate how dialectical thinking is often present in education and development initiatives.","PeriodicalId":51506,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Education Review","volume":"67 1","pages":"147 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability-Inclusive Education, Development, and Dialectics: Complex Cases in Bhutan\",\"authors\":\"C. Johnstone, Matthew J. Schuelka, Yeshi Choeki, T. Yetsho\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/722814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Disability-inclusive education and development have become priorities for global governance organizations over the past decade and have thus introduced new complexities to existing development narratives. One reason for this is the long-standing discourse of “disability models” (medical, social, and cultural models) most often found in disability studies discourses. This study demonstrates that individuals with disabilities and their advocates navigate education and development opportunities through the lens of multiple models simultaneously. In this article, we introduce the philosophical theory of dialectics as a way of understanding how seemingly competing models might simultaneously inform the actions that individuals take in relation to disability-inclusive education and development. We present three minicases—two from teachers and one from a youth with a disability—drawn from a recent 3-year project in Bhutan. These case examples demonstrate how dialectical thinking is often present in education and development initiatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Education Review\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"147 - 166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/722814\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722814","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在过去十年中,包容残疾的教育和发展已成为全球治理组织的优先事项,从而给现有的发展叙事带来了新的复杂性。其中一个原因是长期存在的“残疾模型”(医学、社会和文化模型)话语,最常见于残疾研究话语中。这项研究表明,残疾人及其倡导者同时通过多种模式来把握教育和发展机会。在这篇文章中,我们介绍了辩证法的哲学理论,以此来理解看似相互竞争的模式如何同时为个人在残疾包容教育和发展方面采取的行动提供信息。我们展示了三个微型案例——两个来自教师,一个来自残疾青年——它们来自不丹最近的一个为期三年的项目。这些案例说明了辩证思维是如何经常出现在教育和发展倡议中的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disability-Inclusive Education, Development, and Dialectics: Complex Cases in Bhutan
Disability-inclusive education and development have become priorities for global governance organizations over the past decade and have thus introduced new complexities to existing development narratives. One reason for this is the long-standing discourse of “disability models” (medical, social, and cultural models) most often found in disability studies discourses. This study demonstrates that individuals with disabilities and their advocates navigate education and development opportunities through the lens of multiple models simultaneously. In this article, we introduce the philosophical theory of dialectics as a way of understanding how seemingly competing models might simultaneously inform the actions that individuals take in relation to disability-inclusive education and development. We present three minicases—two from teachers and one from a youth with a disability—drawn from a recent 3-year project in Bhutan. These case examples demonstrate how dialectical thinking is often present in education and development initiatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Education Review
Comparative Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Comparative Education Review investigates education throughout the world and the social, economic, and political forces that shape it. Founded in 1957 to advance knowledge and teaching in comparative education studies, the Review has since established itself as the most reliable source for the analysis of the place of education in countries other than the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信