哥伦比亚大西洋沿岸民事庭外和解分析

IF 1.2 Q1 LAW
A. Godoy, Milton Arrieta-López, S. Noli
{"title":"哥伦比亚大西洋沿岸民事庭外和解分析","authors":"A. Godoy, Milton Arrieta-López, S. Noli","doi":"10.17981/JURIDCUC.14.1.2018.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conciliation as an alternative conflict resolution method was conceived as a positive opportunity for parties to settle their conflicts in a peaceful and concerted manner with the presence of an impartialthird party without decision-making power, but with attributions to address and assertively seek an agreement which will be stated in a conciliation act. However, since the implementation as a procedural requirement, the objective is to discuss if conciliation can be understood as a certain opportunity to protect effective judicial protection or as a simple procedure derived from the law. Based on the statistics of SICAAC on the Atlantic Coast, we can conclude that the benefits of conciliation as an alternative dispute resolution method have not yet been sufficiently internalized by society. The methodology used is the documentary, bibliographic and critical analysis review, when consulting, reviewing and analyzing doctrine, jurisprudence and documentary information originated by the Ministry of Justice.","PeriodicalId":40796,"journal":{"name":"Juridicas CUC","volume":"14 1","pages":"187-210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análisis de la conciliación extrajudicial civil en la Costa Atlántica colombiana\",\"authors\":\"A. Godoy, Milton Arrieta-López, S. Noli\",\"doi\":\"10.17981/JURIDCUC.14.1.2018.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The conciliation as an alternative conflict resolution method was conceived as a positive opportunity for parties to settle their conflicts in a peaceful and concerted manner with the presence of an impartialthird party without decision-making power, but with attributions to address and assertively seek an agreement which will be stated in a conciliation act. However, since the implementation as a procedural requirement, the objective is to discuss if conciliation can be understood as a certain opportunity to protect effective judicial protection or as a simple procedure derived from the law. Based on the statistics of SICAAC on the Atlantic Coast, we can conclude that the benefits of conciliation as an alternative dispute resolution method have not yet been sufficiently internalized by society. The methodology used is the documentary, bibliographic and critical analysis review, when consulting, reviewing and analyzing doctrine, jurisprudence and documentary information originated by the Ministry of Justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juridicas CUC\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"187-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juridicas CUC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17981/JURIDCUC.14.1.2018.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridicas CUC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17981/JURIDCUC.14.1.2018.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

调解作为一种替代性的冲突解决方法,被认为是一个积极的机会,使当事方能够在没有决策权的不可剥夺的第三方在场的情况下,以和平和协调一致的方式解决冲突,但有权解决和果断地寻求一项将在调解法中说明的协议。然而,由于执行是一项程序性要求,目的是讨论调解是否可以被理解为保护有效司法保护的某种机会,或者是一种源自法律的简单程序。根据大西洋海岸SICAAC的统计数据,我们可以得出结论,调解作为一种替代争端解决方法的好处尚未被社会充分内化。在查阅、审查和分析司法部提出的学说、判例和文献资料时,所使用的方法是文献、书目和批判性分析审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Análisis de la conciliación extrajudicial civil en la Costa Atlántica colombiana
The conciliation as an alternative conflict resolution method was conceived as a positive opportunity for parties to settle their conflicts in a peaceful and concerted manner with the presence of an impartialthird party without decision-making power, but with attributions to address and assertively seek an agreement which will be stated in a conciliation act. However, since the implementation as a procedural requirement, the objective is to discuss if conciliation can be understood as a certain opportunity to protect effective judicial protection or as a simple procedure derived from the law. Based on the statistics of SICAAC on the Atlantic Coast, we can conclude that the benefits of conciliation as an alternative dispute resolution method have not yet been sufficiently internalized by society. The methodology used is the documentary, bibliographic and critical analysis review, when consulting, reviewing and analyzing doctrine, jurisprudence and documentary information originated by the Ministry of Justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信