子宫下段过度扩张:宫内球囊填塞失败的原因之一

IF 0.4 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Liangcheng Wang, Kohei Hamamoto, Azusa Kimura, Aya Ishiguro, Isao Horiuchi, K. Takagi
{"title":"子宫下段过度扩张:宫内球囊填塞失败的原因之一","authors":"Liangcheng Wang, Kohei Hamamoto, Azusa Kimura, Aya Ishiguro, Isao Horiuchi, K. Takagi","doi":"10.14390/jsshp.hrp2020-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intrauterine balloon tamponade (IBT) is widely used for treating obstetric hemorrhage. However, only a few reports on IBT failure exist. We report a case of IBT failure caused by an over-expanded lower uterine segment (LUS). A 30-year-old woman with twin pregnancy presented with bleeding after cesarean section. During surgery, uterine atony was observed; however, intravenous administration of oxytocin and ergometrine resolved the condition. Continuous hemorrhage was observed postoperatively, despite the administration of uterotonics and uterine massage. Although IBT was performed, the bleeding persisted, as recognized from the drainage fluid. Enhanced computed tomography revealed that the bleeding spot could not be compressed by the inflated balloon due to the over-expanded LUS. The balloon was removed; uterine artery embolization was required to achieve hemostasis. Our experience indicated that over-expanded LUS could cause IBT failure. If bleeding continues post-IBT replacement and an over-expanded LUS is observed, alternative treatments should be promptly","PeriodicalId":42505,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Over-expanded lower uterine segment: a cause of intrauterine balloon tamponade failure\",\"authors\":\"Liangcheng Wang, Kohei Hamamoto, Azusa Kimura, Aya Ishiguro, Isao Horiuchi, K. Takagi\",\"doi\":\"10.14390/jsshp.hrp2020-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Intrauterine balloon tamponade (IBT) is widely used for treating obstetric hemorrhage. However, only a few reports on IBT failure exist. We report a case of IBT failure caused by an over-expanded lower uterine segment (LUS). A 30-year-old woman with twin pregnancy presented with bleeding after cesarean section. During surgery, uterine atony was observed; however, intravenous administration of oxytocin and ergometrine resolved the condition. Continuous hemorrhage was observed postoperatively, despite the administration of uterotonics and uterine massage. Although IBT was performed, the bleeding persisted, as recognized from the drainage fluid. Enhanced computed tomography revealed that the bleeding spot could not be compressed by the inflated balloon due to the over-expanded LUS. The balloon was removed; uterine artery embolization was required to achieve hemostasis. Our experience indicated that over-expanded LUS could cause IBT failure. If bleeding continues post-IBT replacement and an over-expanded LUS is observed, alternative treatments should be promptly\",\"PeriodicalId\":42505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14390/jsshp.hrp2020-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14390/jsshp.hrp2020-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宫内球囊填塞术(IBT)广泛用于治疗产科出血。然而,只有少数关于IBT失败的报告存在。我们报告了一例因子宫下段(LUS)过度扩张引起的IBT衰竭。一位30岁的双胎妊娠妇女在剖宫产后出现出血。术中观察到子宫收缩乏力;然而,静脉注射催产素和麦角新碱解决了这种情况。术后观察到持续出血,尽管使用了子宫补剂和子宫按摩。尽管进行了IBT,但从引流液中可以看出,出血仍然存在。增强计算机断层扫描显示,由于LUS过度膨胀,膨胀的球囊无法压缩出血点。气球被移走了;需要子宫动脉栓塞止血。我们的经验表明,过度扩展的LUS可能导致IBT失败。如果IBT置换术后出血持续,并且观察到LUS过度扩张,则应立即进行替代治疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Over-expanded lower uterine segment: a cause of intrauterine balloon tamponade failure
Intrauterine balloon tamponade (IBT) is widely used for treating obstetric hemorrhage. However, only a few reports on IBT failure exist. We report a case of IBT failure caused by an over-expanded lower uterine segment (LUS). A 30-year-old woman with twin pregnancy presented with bleeding after cesarean section. During surgery, uterine atony was observed; however, intravenous administration of oxytocin and ergometrine resolved the condition. Continuous hemorrhage was observed postoperatively, despite the administration of uterotonics and uterine massage. Although IBT was performed, the bleeding persisted, as recognized from the drainage fluid. Enhanced computed tomography revealed that the bleeding spot could not be compressed by the inflated balloon due to the over-expanded LUS. The balloon was removed; uterine artery embolization was required to achieve hemostasis. Our experience indicated that over-expanded LUS could cause IBT failure. If bleeding continues post-IBT replacement and an over-expanded LUS is observed, alternative treatments should be promptly
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension Research in Pregnancy
Hypertension Research in Pregnancy OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信