回复对俄罗斯激进主义2.0的批评:定义问题

Q1 Arts and Humanities

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Pub Date : 2017-12-02 DOI:10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0306

Roger E. Bissell

{"title":"回复对俄罗斯激进主义2.0的批评:定义问题","authors":"Roger E. Bissell","doi":"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The author assures readers that Chris Matthew Sciabarra has met all Aristotelian (if not Objectivist) requirements in full, providing not one but two definitions of \"dialectics,\" which, as the art of context-keeping, is indeed an essential part of Ayn Rand's philosophical method. He shows how Sciabarra's definitional process compares quite favorably in terms of timeliness, transparency, and benevolence to that of Rand and other Objectivists, and notes that Sciabarra's overriding concern, notwithstanding his obvious great respect for Rand's substantive philosophical achievements, has been to identify and clarify the methods she and other thinkers have used to profound benefit.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"306 - 320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reply to the Critics of Russian Radical 2.0: Defining Issues\",\"authors\":\"Roger E. Bissell\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:The author assures readers that Chris Matthew Sciabarra has met all Aristotelian (if not Objectivist) requirements in full, providing not one but two definitions of \\\"dialectics,\\\" which, as the art of context-keeping, is indeed an essential part of Ayn Rand's philosophical method. He shows how Sciabarra's definitional process compares quite favorably in terms of timeliness, transparency, and benevolence to that of Rand and other Objectivists, and notes that Sciabarra's overriding concern, notwithstanding his obvious great respect for Rand's substantive philosophical achievements, has been to identify and clarify the methods she and other thinkers have used to profound benefit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"306 - 320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要:作者向读者保证，克里斯·马修·夏巴拉完全符合亚里士多德(如果不是客观主义的话)的所有要求，并为“辩证法”提供了不是一个而是两个定义，辩证法作为一门保持语境的艺术，确实是安·兰德哲学方法的重要组成部分。他展示了西阿巴拉的定义过程如何在及时性、透明度和仁慈性方面与兰德和其他客观主义者的定义过程相比较，并指出，尽管西阿巴拉对兰德的实质性哲学成就表现出极大的尊重，但他最关心的是确定和澄清兰德和其他思想家所使用的方法，这些方法带来了深远的好处。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reply to the Critics of Russian Radical 2.0: Defining Issues

ABSTRACT:The author assures readers that Chris Matthew Sciabarra has met all Aristotelian (if not Objectivist) requirements in full, providing not one but two definitions of "dialectics," which, as the art of context-keeping, is indeed an essential part of Ayn Rand's philosophical method. He shows how Sciabarra's definitional process compares quite favorably in terms of timeliness, transparency, and benevolence to that of Rand and other Objectivists, and notes that Sciabarra's overriding concern, notwithstanding his obvious great respect for Rand's substantive philosophical achievements, has been to identify and clarify the methods she and other thinkers have used to profound benefit.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation has entered into an electronic licensing relationship with EBSCO Publishing, the world"s most prolific aggregator of full-text journals, magazines, and other sources. The full text of The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies can be found on EBSCO Publishing"s databases. A nonpartisan journal devoted to the study of Ayn Rand and her times. The journal is not aligned with any advocacy group, institute, or person. It welcomes papers from every discipline and from a variety of interpretive and critical perspectives. It aims to foster scholarly dialogue through a respectful exchange of ideas. The journal is published semi-annually, in the fall and the spring.