转型过程中私有化与市场化的关系——基于中国省级面板数据的实验分析

IF 2.6 Q1 AREA STUDIES
K. Nakagane, Kohei Mitsunami
{"title":"转型过程中私有化与市场化的关系——基于中国省级面板数据的实验分析","authors":"K. Nakagane, Kohei Mitsunami","doi":"10.1080/24761028.2018.1496808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper explores the nexus between privatization and marketization in pursuit of insightful implications about effective privatization/marketization policies, particularly in institutionally underdeveloped countries like China. Our hypothesis is that, given a certain level of institutional development, we can identify causal and dynamic relationships between privatization and marketization. If market expansion facilitates private ownership more easily and rapidly than privatization promotes marketization, transition policy should emphasize market expansion even if the ultimate objective is to privatize the entire economy as extensively as possible. We test this hypothesis with panel data from Chinese provinces to draw implications about a dynamic nexus between privatization and marketization vis-à-vis institutional background. We then develop an illustrative analysis comparing privatization-first versus marketization-first policies to examine their cumulative effects on development of private enterprises and markets in subsequent periods.","PeriodicalId":37218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies","volume":"7 1","pages":"50 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24761028.2018.1496808","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nexus between privatization and marketization during transition process: an experimental analysis based on China’s provincial panel data\",\"authors\":\"K. Nakagane, Kohei Mitsunami\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24761028.2018.1496808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper explores the nexus between privatization and marketization in pursuit of insightful implications about effective privatization/marketization policies, particularly in institutionally underdeveloped countries like China. Our hypothesis is that, given a certain level of institutional development, we can identify causal and dynamic relationships between privatization and marketization. If market expansion facilitates private ownership more easily and rapidly than privatization promotes marketization, transition policy should emphasize market expansion even if the ultimate objective is to privatize the entire economy as extensively as possible. We test this hypothesis with panel data from Chinese provinces to draw implications about a dynamic nexus between privatization and marketization vis-à-vis institutional background. We then develop an illustrative analysis comparing privatization-first versus marketization-first policies to examine their cumulative effects on development of private enterprises and markets in subsequent periods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"50 - 75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24761028.2018.1496808\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2018.1496808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2018.1496808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本文探讨了私有化和市场化之间的关系,以寻求有效的私有化/市场化政策的深刻启示,特别是在中国等制度不发达国家。我们的假设是,在一定的制度发展水平下,我们可以确定私有化和市场化之间的因果关系和动态关系。如果市场扩张比私有化促进市场化更容易、更快地促进私有制,那么即使最终目标是尽可能广泛地私有化整个经济,过渡政策也应该强调市场扩张。我们用来自中国各省的面板数据来检验这一假设,以得出私有化和市场化之间相对于制度背景的动态联系的含义。然后,我们对私有化优先和市场化优先政策进行了说明性分析,以考察它们在随后时期对私营企业和市场发展的累积影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nexus between privatization and marketization during transition process: an experimental analysis based on China’s provincial panel data
ABSTRACT This paper explores the nexus between privatization and marketization in pursuit of insightful implications about effective privatization/marketization policies, particularly in institutionally underdeveloped countries like China. Our hypothesis is that, given a certain level of institutional development, we can identify causal and dynamic relationships between privatization and marketization. If market expansion facilitates private ownership more easily and rapidly than privatization promotes marketization, transition policy should emphasize market expansion even if the ultimate objective is to privatize the entire economy as extensively as possible. We test this hypothesis with panel data from Chinese provinces to draw implications about a dynamic nexus between privatization and marketization vis-à-vis institutional background. We then develop an illustrative analysis comparing privatization-first versus marketization-first policies to examine their cumulative effects on development of private enterprises and markets in subsequent periods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies
Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信