水稻常规种植的经济效益与米纳帕迪生产要素

Alifa Merliana, Bambang Mulyatno Setiawan, K. Budiraharjo
{"title":"水稻常规种植的经济效益与米纳帕迪生产要素","authors":"Alifa Merliana, Bambang Mulyatno Setiawan, K. Budiraharjo","doi":"10.24843/soca.2021.v15.i03.p10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economic efficiency analysis is used to determine the level of efficiency from economic perspective. Economic efficiency analysis is carried out by determining the equivalence value between Marginal Product Value and Marginal Sacrifice Cost. The objectives of this research are analyzing the impact of the use of inputs on the resulting output, comparing the amount of production, analyzing economic efficiency, and calculating income. The location of this research was determined purposively. The method used in the sampling process was probability sampling with cluster random sampling technique. The number of samples was 60 respondents, consisting of 30 members from two different types of farming. The data analysis used was influence test, independent difference test, one sample t-test, multiple linear regression, economic efficiency analysis, and farm income. The results show that there is a simultaneous influence on the use of inputs on farm output. There is a partial effect of the use of land and seed inputs on output; however, fertilizers, the amount of labor, and variables have no effect. There is no difference in the yield obtained between regular rice farming and mina padi combined farming (A form of combined farming that utilizes stagnant water from the planted rice fields as a pond for fish cultivation that maximizes the yield of rice fields). Economic efficiency cannot be achieved in rice farming, as well as the use of production factors in mina padi. Rice farming produces a lower average income than mina padi.","PeriodicalId":33446,"journal":{"name":"Soca Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Efficiency of Regular Rice Farming and Mina Padi Production Factors\",\"authors\":\"Alifa Merliana, Bambang Mulyatno Setiawan, K. Budiraharjo\",\"doi\":\"10.24843/soca.2021.v15.i03.p10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Economic efficiency analysis is used to determine the level of efficiency from economic perspective. Economic efficiency analysis is carried out by determining the equivalence value between Marginal Product Value and Marginal Sacrifice Cost. The objectives of this research are analyzing the impact of the use of inputs on the resulting output, comparing the amount of production, analyzing economic efficiency, and calculating income. The location of this research was determined purposively. The method used in the sampling process was probability sampling with cluster random sampling technique. The number of samples was 60 respondents, consisting of 30 members from two different types of farming. The data analysis used was influence test, independent difference test, one sample t-test, multiple linear regression, economic efficiency analysis, and farm income. The results show that there is a simultaneous influence on the use of inputs on farm output. There is a partial effect of the use of land and seed inputs on output; however, fertilizers, the amount of labor, and variables have no effect. There is no difference in the yield obtained between regular rice farming and mina padi combined farming (A form of combined farming that utilizes stagnant water from the planted rice fields as a pond for fish cultivation that maximizes the yield of rice fields). Economic efficiency cannot be achieved in rice farming, as well as the use of production factors in mina padi. Rice farming produces a lower average income than mina padi.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soca Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soca Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24843/soca.2021.v15.i03.p10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soca Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/soca.2021.v15.i03.p10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经济效率分析用于从经济角度确定效率水平。经济效率分析是通过确定边际产品价值和边际牺牲成本之间的等价值来进行的。本研究的目的是分析投入使用对产出的影响,比较生产量,分析经济效率,并计算收入。这项研究的地点是有目的地确定的。抽样过程中使用的方法是概率抽样和聚类随机抽样技术。样本数量为60名受访者,包括来自两种不同农业类型的30名成员。使用的数据分析包括影响检验、独立差异检验、单样本t检验、多元线性回归、经济效率分析和农业收入。结果表明,投入对农业产出的使用同时受到影响。土地和种子投入的使用对产出产生了部分影响;然而,肥料、劳动力数量和变量都没有影响。常规水稻种植和mina-padi联合种植(一种联合种植形式,利用种植稻田的积水作为养鱼池塘,最大限度地提高稻田产量)之间的产量没有差异。水稻种植和米纳帕迪生产要素的使用无法实现经济效益。水稻种植的平均收入低于米纳帕迪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic Efficiency of Regular Rice Farming and Mina Padi Production Factors
Economic efficiency analysis is used to determine the level of efficiency from economic perspective. Economic efficiency analysis is carried out by determining the equivalence value between Marginal Product Value and Marginal Sacrifice Cost. The objectives of this research are analyzing the impact of the use of inputs on the resulting output, comparing the amount of production, analyzing economic efficiency, and calculating income. The location of this research was determined purposively. The method used in the sampling process was probability sampling with cluster random sampling technique. The number of samples was 60 respondents, consisting of 30 members from two different types of farming. The data analysis used was influence test, independent difference test, one sample t-test, multiple linear regression, economic efficiency analysis, and farm income. The results show that there is a simultaneous influence on the use of inputs on farm output. There is a partial effect of the use of land and seed inputs on output; however, fertilizers, the amount of labor, and variables have no effect. There is no difference in the yield obtained between regular rice farming and mina padi combined farming (A form of combined farming that utilizes stagnant water from the planted rice fields as a pond for fish cultivation that maximizes the yield of rice fields). Economic efficiency cannot be achieved in rice farming, as well as the use of production factors in mina padi. Rice farming produces a lower average income than mina padi.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信