无形损失:为经历围产期损失的个人制定术语的德尔菲方法

IF 0.5 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Rachel M. Diamond, Jessica L. Chou, Susan A. Bonis
{"title":"无形损失:为经历围产期损失的个人制定术语的德尔菲方法","authors":"Rachel M. Diamond, Jessica L. Chou, Susan A. Bonis","doi":"10.1080/08952833.2020.1848055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this Delphi pilot study was to 1) identify potential benefits to people who experienced perinatal loss if a term were established; 2) develop a term for people who experienced a perinatal loss because, at present, no term exists; and, 3) identify areas of consensus and contention between perinatal loss professionals and parents when considering terminology. Fifty-five participants (perinatal loss professionals, n = 33; perinatally bereaved parents, n = 22) proposed, reviewed, and rated terms through three rounds of surveys until bereaved parent was selected. Top terms were equally preferred between parents and professionals and, in general, participants described benefits to term development. Findings provide the perinatal loss community a first step in considering terminology.","PeriodicalId":44214,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY","volume":"33 1","pages":"81 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08952833.2020.1848055","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Invisible Loss: A Delphi Approach to Develop A Term for Individuals Who Experienced Perinatal Loss\",\"authors\":\"Rachel M. Diamond, Jessica L. Chou, Susan A. Bonis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08952833.2020.1848055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The purpose of this Delphi pilot study was to 1) identify potential benefits to people who experienced perinatal loss if a term were established; 2) develop a term for people who experienced a perinatal loss because, at present, no term exists; and, 3) identify areas of consensus and contention between perinatal loss professionals and parents when considering terminology. Fifty-five participants (perinatal loss professionals, n = 33; perinatally bereaved parents, n = 22) proposed, reviewed, and rated terms through three rounds of surveys until bereaved parent was selected. Top terms were equally preferred between parents and professionals and, in general, participants described benefits to term development. Findings provide the perinatal loss community a first step in considering terminology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"81 - 100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08952833.2020.1848055\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2020.1848055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2020.1848055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本德尔菲试点研究的目的是:1)确定如果建立一个术语,对经历围产期损失的人的潜在益处;2)为那些经历过围产期损失的人创造一个术语,因为目前还没有这样的术语;并且,3)在考虑术语时,确定围产期损失专业人员和父母之间的共识和争论的领域。55名参与者(围产期损失专业人员,n = 33;围产期丧亲父母(n = 22)通过三轮调查提出、审查和评价术语,直到丧亲父母被选中。家长和专业人士都同样喜欢最重要的术语,一般来说,参与者描述了术语发展的好处。研究结果提供围产期损失社区考虑术语的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Invisible Loss: A Delphi Approach to Develop A Term for Individuals Who Experienced Perinatal Loss
ABSTRACT The purpose of this Delphi pilot study was to 1) identify potential benefits to people who experienced perinatal loss if a term were established; 2) develop a term for people who experienced a perinatal loss because, at present, no term exists; and, 3) identify areas of consensus and contention between perinatal loss professionals and parents when considering terminology. Fifty-five participants (perinatal loss professionals, n = 33; perinatally bereaved parents, n = 22) proposed, reviewed, and rated terms through three rounds of surveys until bereaved parent was selected. Top terms were equally preferred between parents and professionals and, in general, participants described benefits to term development. Findings provide the perinatal loss community a first step in considering terminology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Feminist Family Therapy provides an international forum to further explore the relationship between feminist theory and family therapy theory and practice. The journal presents thought-provoking and insightful articles of a theoretical nature, as well as articles focusing on empirical research and clinical application. The Journal of Feminist Family Therapy critiques family therapy concepts from a feminist perspective with careful attention to cultural, class, and racial differences, applies a feminist-sensitive perspective to the treatment issues particular to women such as depression, agoraphobia, eating disorders, incest, and domestic abuse, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信