残疾政策和实践中的个性化:通过专业演员的镜头进行分析

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
Francesca Pozzoli
{"title":"残疾政策和实践中的个性化:通过专业演员的镜头进行分析","authors":"Francesca Pozzoli","doi":"10.1080/02650533.2022.2119948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT ‘Personalisation’ is nowadays a very popular concept in disability policy and this article – drawing on my PhD research project in the English and Lombardian context of social care services for disabled people – aims to explore the translation of personalisation from policy into practice; hence the ways in which personalisation policy makes its way into disability services. In particular, drawing on street-level-bureaucracy, policy practice and network theories, personalisation is analysed here through the lenses of professional actors. The application of a mix of qualitative research methods brought me to two main conclusions: 1) narrow approaches to personalisation coexist with broader ones, leading to very different roles for professionals charged with translating personalisation policy into practice; 2) power differences and asymmetries are at play among different professional actors, with some having stronger discretional and policy steering capacity compared to others when it comes to informing person-centred care practice.","PeriodicalId":46754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work Practice","volume":"36 1","pages":"401 - 413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalisation in disability policy and practice: an analysis through the lenses of professional actors\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Pozzoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02650533.2022.2119948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT ‘Personalisation’ is nowadays a very popular concept in disability policy and this article – drawing on my PhD research project in the English and Lombardian context of social care services for disabled people – aims to explore the translation of personalisation from policy into practice; hence the ways in which personalisation policy makes its way into disability services. In particular, drawing on street-level-bureaucracy, policy practice and network theories, personalisation is analysed here through the lenses of professional actors. The application of a mix of qualitative research methods brought me to two main conclusions: 1) narrow approaches to personalisation coexist with broader ones, leading to very different roles for professionals charged with translating personalisation policy into practice; 2) power differences and asymmetries are at play among different professional actors, with some having stronger discretional and policy steering capacity compared to others when it comes to informing person-centred care practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Work Practice\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"401 - 413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Work Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2022.2119948\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2022.2119948","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要“个性化”是当今残疾政策中一个非常流行的概念,本文借鉴了我在英语和伦巴第语背景下的残疾人社会护理服务博士研究项目,旨在探索个性化从政策到实践的转化;因此,个性化政策进入残疾人服务的方式。特别是,借鉴街道层面的官僚机构、政策实践和网络理论,本文通过专业行为者的视角对个性化进行了分析。定性研究方法的结合使我得出了两个主要结论:1)狭义的个性化方法与广义的个性化方法共存,导致负责将个性化政策转化为实践的专业人员扮演截然不同的角色;2) 不同的专业行动者之间存在权力差异和不对称,在为以人为中心的护理实践提供信息方面,一些行动者比其他行动者具有更强的自由裁量权和政策指导能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personalisation in disability policy and practice: an analysis through the lenses of professional actors
ABSTRACT ‘Personalisation’ is nowadays a very popular concept in disability policy and this article – drawing on my PhD research project in the English and Lombardian context of social care services for disabled people – aims to explore the translation of personalisation from policy into practice; hence the ways in which personalisation policy makes its way into disability services. In particular, drawing on street-level-bureaucracy, policy practice and network theories, personalisation is analysed here through the lenses of professional actors. The application of a mix of qualitative research methods brought me to two main conclusions: 1) narrow approaches to personalisation coexist with broader ones, leading to very different roles for professionals charged with translating personalisation policy into practice; 2) power differences and asymmetries are at play among different professional actors, with some having stronger discretional and policy steering capacity compared to others when it comes to informing person-centred care practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work Practice publishes high quality refereed articles devoted to the exploration and analysis of practice in social welfare and allied health professions from psychodynamic and systemic perspectives. This includes counselling, social care planning, education and training, research, institutional life, management and organisation or policy-making. Articles are also welcome that critically examine the psychodynamic tradition in the light of other theoretical orientations or explanatory systems. The Journal of Social Work Practice is committed to a policy of equal opportunities and actively strives to foster all forms of intercultural dialogue and debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信