COVID-19疫苗决策分析

IF 1.2 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
D. Ozsahin, Mehmet Ilker Gelisen, M. Taiwo, Yasemin Agachan, Dorrin Rahi, B. Uzun
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗决策分析","authors":"D. Ozsahin, Mehmet Ilker Gelisen, M. Taiwo, Yasemin Agachan, Dorrin Rahi, B. Uzun","doi":"10.2478/ebtj-2021-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The entire globe is struggling with the COVID-19 pandemic since March 11, 2020. There is still a large number of infected patients and death, and there is no proven treatment for the infection yet. This has led to the race in vaccine development to protect people from COVID-19 infection. As of February 3, 2021, there were 289 experimental COVID -19 vaccines in development, 66 of which were in clinical trials with different phases, and 20 of them were in phase 3. This study aims to evaluate 15 important vaccines based on criteria such as the dose number, dosing schedule, storage advantages, efficacy, and side effect. In this evaluation, we use the fuzzy PROMETHEE approach, which is an important Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) technique. The importance level of the criteria is determined based on expert opinion. The result shows that the EpiVacCorona vaccine is the most effective vaccine to prevent COVID-19 infections based on the selected criteria and the importance level of each criterion. The result obtained may change based on individual or expert’s priorities. Due to the use of different criteria for the ranking and different weightings of the criteria, the ranking result may differ. This study also shows the strengths and weaknesses of the selected vaccines and the applicability of the MCDM technique for the evaluation of COVID -19 vaccines.","PeriodicalId":22379,"journal":{"name":"The EuroBiotech Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision Analysis of the COVID-19 Vaccines\",\"authors\":\"D. Ozsahin, Mehmet Ilker Gelisen, M. Taiwo, Yasemin Agachan, Dorrin Rahi, B. Uzun\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/ebtj-2021-0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The entire globe is struggling with the COVID-19 pandemic since March 11, 2020. There is still a large number of infected patients and death, and there is no proven treatment for the infection yet. This has led to the race in vaccine development to protect people from COVID-19 infection. As of February 3, 2021, there were 289 experimental COVID -19 vaccines in development, 66 of which were in clinical trials with different phases, and 20 of them were in phase 3. This study aims to evaluate 15 important vaccines based on criteria such as the dose number, dosing schedule, storage advantages, efficacy, and side effect. In this evaluation, we use the fuzzy PROMETHEE approach, which is an important Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) technique. The importance level of the criteria is determined based on expert opinion. The result shows that the EpiVacCorona vaccine is the most effective vaccine to prevent COVID-19 infections based on the selected criteria and the importance level of each criterion. The result obtained may change based on individual or expert’s priorities. Due to the use of different criteria for the ranking and different weightings of the criteria, the ranking result may differ. This study also shows the strengths and weaknesses of the selected vaccines and the applicability of the MCDM technique for the evaluation of COVID -19 vaccines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The EuroBiotech Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The EuroBiotech Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/ebtj-2021-0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The EuroBiotech Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ebtj-2021-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

摘要自2020年3月11日以来,全球都在与新冠肺炎大流行作斗争。仍有大量感染患者和死亡,目前还没有被证实的感染治疗方法。这导致了保护人们免受新冠肺炎感染的疫苗开发竞赛。截至2021年2月3日,共有289种实验性COVID-19疫苗正在开发中,其中66种处于不同阶段的临床试验中,其中20种处于第三阶段。本研究旨在根据剂量数、给药计划、储存优势、疗效和副作用等标准评估15种重要疫苗。在这个评估中,我们使用了模糊PROMETHEE方法,这是一种重要的多准则决策(MCDM)技术。标准的重要性级别是根据专家意见确定的。结果表明,根据选择的标准和每个标准的重要性水平,EpiVacCorona疫苗是预防新冠肺炎感染的最有效疫苗。所获得的结果可能会根据个人或专家的优先级而变化。由于使用不同的标准进行排名以及标准的不同权重,排名结果可能不同。这项研究还显示了所选疫苗的优势和劣势,以及MCDM技术在评估COVID-19疫苗方面的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision Analysis of the COVID-19 Vaccines
Abstract The entire globe is struggling with the COVID-19 pandemic since March 11, 2020. There is still a large number of infected patients and death, and there is no proven treatment for the infection yet. This has led to the race in vaccine development to protect people from COVID-19 infection. As of February 3, 2021, there were 289 experimental COVID -19 vaccines in development, 66 of which were in clinical trials with different phases, and 20 of them were in phase 3. This study aims to evaluate 15 important vaccines based on criteria such as the dose number, dosing schedule, storage advantages, efficacy, and side effect. In this evaluation, we use the fuzzy PROMETHEE approach, which is an important Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) technique. The importance level of the criteria is determined based on expert opinion. The result shows that the EpiVacCorona vaccine is the most effective vaccine to prevent COVID-19 infections based on the selected criteria and the importance level of each criterion. The result obtained may change based on individual or expert’s priorities. Due to the use of different criteria for the ranking and different weightings of the criteria, the ranking result may differ. This study also shows the strengths and weaknesses of the selected vaccines and the applicability of the MCDM technique for the evaluation of COVID -19 vaccines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The EuroBiotech Journal
The EuroBiotech Journal Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信