灵性还是社会生态学?——兼收不蓄的信仰者精神幸福感问卷的心理测量特性研究

Q4 Psychology
J. Silva, A. Pereira, S. Monteiro
{"title":"灵性还是社会生态学?——兼收不蓄的信仰者精神幸福感问卷的心理测量特性研究","authors":"J. Silva, A. Pereira, S. Monteiro","doi":"10.37708/psyct.v13i1.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Spiritual Well-being Questionnaire (SWBQ) was widely studied as a psychological instrument; yet, there is a lack of its use in non-religious research.  This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the SWBQ in a sample of practising believers, non-practising believers, sceptics and atheists. A total number of 279 participants aged between 17 and 69 ( M =24.42, SD =9.463) completed the SWBQ and socio-demographic measurements. The SWBQ’s factorial structure proved to be different from the original version, suggesting inconsistencies between content validity and factorial validity. Environmental Domain was the factor with the greatest statistical weight in the scale's total variance. SWBQ’s metrical properties are contrary to a synergic spirituality.","PeriodicalId":37380,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Thought","volume":"13 1","pages":"205-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SPIRITUALITY OR SOCIO-ECOLOGY? – STUDY OF THE PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SPIRITUAL WELL-BEING QUESTIONNAIRE IN AN ECLECTIC SAMPLE OF BELIEVERS\",\"authors\":\"J. Silva, A. Pereira, S. Monteiro\",\"doi\":\"10.37708/psyct.v13i1.409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Spiritual Well-being Questionnaire (SWBQ) was widely studied as a psychological instrument; yet, there is a lack of its use in non-religious research.  This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the SWBQ in a sample of practising believers, non-practising believers, sceptics and atheists. A total number of 279 participants aged between 17 and 69 ( M =24.42, SD =9.463) completed the SWBQ and socio-demographic measurements. The SWBQ’s factorial structure proved to be different from the original version, suggesting inconsistencies between content validity and factorial validity. Environmental Domain was the factor with the greatest statistical weight in the scale's total variance. SWBQ’s metrical properties are contrary to a synergic spirituality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Thought\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"205-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37708/psyct.v13i1.409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37708/psyct.v13i1.409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

精神健康问卷作为一种心理工具得到了广泛的研究;然而,它在非宗教研究中缺乏应用。本研究的目的是探讨在实践信仰者、非实践信仰者、怀疑论者和无神论者的样本中SWBQ的心理测量特性。共有279名17 ~ 69岁的参与者(M =24.42, SD =9.463)完成了SWBQ和社会人口学测量。SWBQ的析因结构被证明与原始版本不同,表明内容效度与析因效度不一致。环境域是量表总方差中统计权重最大的因子。SWBQ的格律特性与协同精神是相反的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SPIRITUALITY OR SOCIO-ECOLOGY? – STUDY OF THE PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SPIRITUAL WELL-BEING QUESTIONNAIRE IN AN ECLECTIC SAMPLE OF BELIEVERS
The Spiritual Well-being Questionnaire (SWBQ) was widely studied as a psychological instrument; yet, there is a lack of its use in non-religious research.  This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the SWBQ in a sample of practising believers, non-practising believers, sceptics and atheists. A total number of 279 participants aged between 17 and 69 ( M =24.42, SD =9.463) completed the SWBQ and socio-demographic measurements. The SWBQ’s factorial structure proved to be different from the original version, suggesting inconsistencies between content validity and factorial validity. Environmental Domain was the factor with the greatest statistical weight in the scale's total variance. SWBQ’s metrical properties are contrary to a synergic spirituality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Thought
Psychological Thought Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal "Psychological Thought" publishes its papers in English or in Bulgarian in all areas of psychology. It is focused on the psychological theory and practice. The papers could be some original research articles, meta-analysis data, clinical reports, case studies, students'' essays, and book reviews. This journal is designed for psychologists, researchers, and psychology students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信