周围区前列腺癌症1.5T扩散加权磁共振成像:b值组合对表观扩散系数诊断性能的影响

A. Rezaeian, M. Ostovari, M. Hoseini-Ghahfarokhi, Hashem Khanbabaei
{"title":"周围区前列腺癌症1.5T扩散加权磁共振成像:b值组合对表观扩散系数诊断性能的影响","authors":"A. Rezaeian, M. Ostovari, M. Hoseini-Ghahfarokhi, Hashem Khanbabaei","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2022.115715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Diffusion-weighted imaging as a noninvasive functional modality plays a valuable role in the evaluation of prostate cancer. However, there is still no agreement on the number and range of b-values to be used. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of b-value choice on the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for prostate cancer detection. Material and methods Fifty-nine consecutive patients with abnormal digital rectal examination findings and raised serum prostate-specific antigen were chosen for magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate before systematic 12-core trans-rectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. ADC values for each ROI were calculated from different b-value combinations (0-1600 s/mm2) by a monoexponential model. Mann-Whitney and the paired-sample t-test were used to compare the mean ADC values for malignant lesions and noncancerous tissues. ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ADC values in distinguishing prostate cancer from normal-tissue ROIs. Results The differences between mean ADC values of malignant lesions and contralateral healthy tissues were significant for all the pairs of b-value combinations. The pair of b-values 50 and 1200 provided the highest AUC (0.94), with a sensitivity of 90.2%, a specificity of 92.6%, and an accuracy of 91.2% at an ADC cut-off of 1.23 × 10-3 mm2/s. Conclusions Our study showed that using a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner the diagnostic performance of ADC values estimated from the b-value pair 50 and 1200 s/mm2 was highest. However, some other b-value pairs provided statically comparable diagnostic performance.","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":"87 1","pages":"e215 - e219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for peripheral zone prostate cancer: the influence of the b-value combination on the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient\",\"authors\":\"A. Rezaeian, M. Ostovari, M. Hoseini-Ghahfarokhi, Hashem Khanbabaei\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjr.2022.115715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose Diffusion-weighted imaging as a noninvasive functional modality plays a valuable role in the evaluation of prostate cancer. However, there is still no agreement on the number and range of b-values to be used. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of b-value choice on the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for prostate cancer detection. Material and methods Fifty-nine consecutive patients with abnormal digital rectal examination findings and raised serum prostate-specific antigen were chosen for magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate before systematic 12-core trans-rectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. ADC values for each ROI were calculated from different b-value combinations (0-1600 s/mm2) by a monoexponential model. Mann-Whitney and the paired-sample t-test were used to compare the mean ADC values for malignant lesions and noncancerous tissues. ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ADC values in distinguishing prostate cancer from normal-tissue ROIs. Results The differences between mean ADC values of malignant lesions and contralateral healthy tissues were significant for all the pairs of b-value combinations. The pair of b-values 50 and 1200 provided the highest AUC (0.94), with a sensitivity of 90.2%, a specificity of 92.6%, and an accuracy of 91.2% at an ADC cut-off of 1.23 × 10-3 mm2/s. Conclusions Our study showed that using a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner the diagnostic performance of ADC values estimated from the b-value pair 50 and 1200 s/mm2 was highest. However, some other b-value pairs provided statically comparable diagnostic performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish journal of radiology\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"e215 - e219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish journal of radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.115715\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.115715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的弥散加权成像作为一种无创功能方式,在前列腺癌的诊断中具有重要价值。然而,对于要使用的b值的数量和范围仍然没有达成一致。因此,本研究的目的是探讨b值选择对表观扩散系数(ADC)值诊断前列腺癌的影响。材料与方法选择连续59例直肠指检异常、血清前列腺特异性抗原升高的患者,在系统经直肠12芯超声引导下行前列腺活检前行前列腺磁共振成像。通过单指数模型从不同的b值组合(0-1600 s/mm2)计算每个ROI的ADC值。采用Mann-Whitney和配对样本t检验比较恶性病变和非癌组织的平均ADC值。采用ROC曲线分析评价ADC值在区分前列腺癌和正常组织roi中的诊断性能。结果各对b值组合中,恶性病变与对侧健康组织的平均ADC值差异均有统计学意义。b值50和1200提供了最高的AUC(0.94),灵敏度为90.2%,特异性为92.6%,准确度为91.2%,ADC截止值为1.23 × 10-3 mm2/s。我们的研究表明,使用1.5特斯拉MRI扫描仪,从b值对50和1200 s/mm2估计的ADC值的诊断性能最高。然而,其他一些b值对提供静态可比较的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for peripheral zone prostate cancer: the influence of the b-value combination on the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient
Purpose Diffusion-weighted imaging as a noninvasive functional modality plays a valuable role in the evaluation of prostate cancer. However, there is still no agreement on the number and range of b-values to be used. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of b-value choice on the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for prostate cancer detection. Material and methods Fifty-nine consecutive patients with abnormal digital rectal examination findings and raised serum prostate-specific antigen were chosen for magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate before systematic 12-core trans-rectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. ADC values for each ROI were calculated from different b-value combinations (0-1600 s/mm2) by a monoexponential model. Mann-Whitney and the paired-sample t-test were used to compare the mean ADC values for malignant lesions and noncancerous tissues. ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ADC values in distinguishing prostate cancer from normal-tissue ROIs. Results The differences between mean ADC values of malignant lesions and contralateral healthy tissues were significant for all the pairs of b-value combinations. The pair of b-values 50 and 1200 provided the highest AUC (0.94), with a sensitivity of 90.2%, a specificity of 92.6%, and an accuracy of 91.2% at an ADC cut-off of 1.23 × 10-3 mm2/s. Conclusions Our study showed that using a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner the diagnostic performance of ADC values estimated from the b-value pair 50 and 1200 s/mm2 was highest. However, some other b-value pairs provided statically comparable diagnostic performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信