停止性生活

IF 1.1 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
L. McKenzie
{"title":"停止性生活","authors":"L. McKenzie","doi":"10.3167/aia.2020.270302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the transformation of singledom during the COVID-19 pan-demic, scrutinising the impact of rules and regulations governing proximity, touch and sex I focus on government responses in Australia, situating the nation’s experience in a global con-text National discussions were strangely sexless, presuming widespread coupledom and em-phasising the lost, non-sexual intimacies of families and older people I contrast this to broader theoretical claims of a ‘transformation of intimacy’ that posit a move to atomised relations across the Global North, including a growing tendency towards singledom Yet assumptions of coupledom clearly persist in Australian policy and social life I reflect on transformations of singledom and living alone during and prior to the pandemic, exposing tensions between theorisations, local realities, and the governance of sex and singledom © The Author(s)","PeriodicalId":43493,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology in Action-Journal for Applied Anthropology in Policy and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shutting Down Sex\",\"authors\":\"L. McKenzie\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/aia.2020.270302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the transformation of singledom during the COVID-19 pan-demic, scrutinising the impact of rules and regulations governing proximity, touch and sex I focus on government responses in Australia, situating the nation’s experience in a global con-text National discussions were strangely sexless, presuming widespread coupledom and em-phasising the lost, non-sexual intimacies of families and older people I contrast this to broader theoretical claims of a ‘transformation of intimacy’ that posit a move to atomised relations across the Global North, including a growing tendency towards singledom Yet assumptions of coupledom clearly persist in Australian policy and social life I reflect on transformations of singledom and living alone during and prior to the pandemic, exposing tensions between theorisations, local realities, and the governance of sex and singledom © The Author(s)\",\"PeriodicalId\":43493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology in Action-Journal for Applied Anthropology in Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology in Action-Journal for Applied Anthropology in Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2020.270302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology in Action-Journal for Applied Anthropology in Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2020.270302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

这篇文章探讨了新冠肺炎大流行期间单身的转变,仔细研究了关于亲近、触摸和性的规则和规定的影响。我将重点放在澳大利亚政府的应对措施上,将该国的经验放在全球范围内,家庭和老年人的非性亲密关系我将其与更广泛的“亲密关系转变”的理论主张进行了对比,该理论主张在全球北方向原子化关系转变,包括越来越倾向于单身。然而,澳大利亚政策和社会生活中明显存在着对夫妻关系的假设。我反思了疫情期间和之前单身和独居的转变,暴露了理论、当地现实以及性和单身管理之间的紧张关系©作者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shutting Down Sex
This article examines the transformation of singledom during the COVID-19 pan-demic, scrutinising the impact of rules and regulations governing proximity, touch and sex I focus on government responses in Australia, situating the nation’s experience in a global con-text National discussions were strangely sexless, presuming widespread coupledom and em-phasising the lost, non-sexual intimacies of families and older people I contrast this to broader theoretical claims of a ‘transformation of intimacy’ that posit a move to atomised relations across the Global North, including a growing tendency towards singledom Yet assumptions of coupledom clearly persist in Australian policy and social life I reflect on transformations of singledom and living alone during and prior to the pandemic, exposing tensions between theorisations, local realities, and the governance of sex and singledom © The Author(s)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Anthropology in Action (AIA) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing articles, commentaries, research reports, and book reviews in applied anthropology. Contributions reflect the use of anthropological training in policy- or practice-oriented work and foster the broader application of these approaches to practical problems. The journal provides a forum for debate and analysis for anthropologists working both inside and outside academia and aims to promote communication amongst practitioners, academics and students of anthropology in order to advance the cross-fertilisation of expertise and ideas. Recent themes and articles have included the anthropology of welfare, transferring anthropological skills to applied health research, design considerations in old-age living, museum-based anthropology education, cultural identities and British citizenship, feminism and anthropology, and international student and youth mobility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信