RechtIdee Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.21107/ri.v17i2.16780
Ardiyanto Ardiyanto
{"title":"KEDUDUKAN HUKUM PEMEGANG HAK TANGGUNGAN ATAS TANAH HAK GUNA BANGUNAN DI ATAS TANAH NEGARA YANG JANGKA WAKTUNYA TELAH BERAKHIR","authors":"Ardiyanto Ardiyanto","doi":"10.21107/ri.v17i2.16780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current positive law no longer allows HGB to be extended continuously, and must return to state land. One of the reasons for the loss of mortgage rights is related to the expiration of the HGB. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal consequences and legal protection for creditors holding mortgage rights after the HGB expires. The results of the research are that the lex posteriori derogat lex priori principle results in PP 18/2021 which is in the hierarchy of the Job Creation Law to override old regulations that are at the same level as government regulations. With the implementation of Article 37 PP 18/2021 there is a gap in the position of banks as preferred creditors to become concurrent creditors because the HGB has returned to become state land. In non-litigation efforts by regulating clauses related to extension, renewal and re-application of HGB in credit agreements that are preventive in nature against Article 37 PP 18/2021. Litigation efforts against the abolition of mortgage rights must be carried out in a default suit or unlawful act.","PeriodicalId":31500,"journal":{"name":"RechtIdee","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RechtIdee","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v17i2.16780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现行的实在法不再允许HGB持续延长,必须回归国有土地。抵押权丧失的原因之一与住房抵押贷款到期有关。本研究的目的是分析HGB到期后持有抵押权的债权人的法律后果及法律保护。研究结果显示,在创造就业机会法的层级PP 18/2021中,“后事法克减在先事法”原则取代了与政府法规处于同一层次的旧法规。随着PP第18/2021条第37条的实施,银行作为优先债权人的地位出现了差距,因为HGB已经恢复为国有土地。在非诉讼方面,通过规范信贷协议中有关HGB延期、续期和重新申请的条款,这些条款在本质上是对PP第18/2021条第37条的预防性规定。反对取消抵押权的诉讼努力必须在违约诉讼或违法行为中进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM PEMEGANG HAK TANGGUNGAN ATAS TANAH HAK GUNA BANGUNAN DI ATAS TANAH NEGARA YANG JANGKA WAKTUNYA TELAH BERAKHIR
The current positive law no longer allows HGB to be extended continuously, and must return to state land. One of the reasons for the loss of mortgage rights is related to the expiration of the HGB. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal consequences and legal protection for creditors holding mortgage rights after the HGB expires. The results of the research are that the lex posteriori derogat lex priori principle results in PP 18/2021 which is in the hierarchy of the Job Creation Law to override old regulations that are at the same level as government regulations. With the implementation of Article 37 PP 18/2021 there is a gap in the position of banks as preferred creditors to become concurrent creditors because the HGB has returned to become state land. In non-litigation efforts by regulating clauses related to extension, renewal and re-application of HGB in credit agreements that are preventive in nature against Article 37 PP 18/2021. Litigation efforts against the abolition of mortgage rights must be carried out in a default suit or unlawful act.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信