葡萄牙有多少人患有痴呆症?国家预算讨论文件

Q3 Medicine
Portuguese Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2021-06-24 eCollection Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1159/000516503
Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira, Ana Verdelho, Matthew Prina, Maria João Marques, Miguel Xavier
{"title":"葡萄牙有多少人患有痴呆症?国家预算讨论文件","authors":"Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira, Ana Verdelho, Matthew Prina, Maria João Marques, Miguel Xavier","doi":"10.1159/000516503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dementia poses major public health challenges, and high-quality epidemiological data are needed for service planning. Published estimates of numbers of people with dementia in Portugal have been based, in most cases, on prevalence rates derived from international studies or expert consensus. As in many other countries, Portuguese community prevalence studies' results are nongeneralizable to a country level. Moreover, their prevalence estimates differ (not surprisingly, owing to different methodologies, e.g., design, sampling, and diagnostic criteria). Regardless, the Portuguese 10/66 Dementia Research Group (10/66 DRG) population-based survey fulfilled 10 out of 11 Alzheimer's Disease International quality criteria for prevalence studies. It relied on cross-culturally validated methods, fostering a wide comparability of results. Therefore, we can provide rough estimates of 217,549 community dwellers with dementia in Portugal according to the 10/66 DRG criteria (that would be only 85,162 according to DSM-IV criteria). This refers to people aged 65 years or older who are not institutionalized. Although broadly consistent with international projections, these estimates must be cautiously interpreted. Particularly in the context of scarce funding, which will probably last for years, we need more efficient, evidence-based dementia policies. Concerning further epidemiological studies, high-quality methods are needed but also their comparability potential should be improved at national and international levels. Most of all, fund allocation in Portugal should now privilege routine dementia information systems in both health and social services.</p>","PeriodicalId":37244,"journal":{"name":"Portuguese Journal of Public Health","volume":"39 1","pages":"58-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Many People Live with Dementia in Portugal? A Discussion Paper of National Estimates.\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira, Ana Verdelho, Matthew Prina, Maria João Marques, Miguel Xavier\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000516503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dementia poses major public health challenges, and high-quality epidemiological data are needed for service planning. Published estimates of numbers of people with dementia in Portugal have been based, in most cases, on prevalence rates derived from international studies or expert consensus. As in many other countries, Portuguese community prevalence studies' results are nongeneralizable to a country level. Moreover, their prevalence estimates differ (not surprisingly, owing to different methodologies, e.g., design, sampling, and diagnostic criteria). Regardless, the Portuguese 10/66 Dementia Research Group (10/66 DRG) population-based survey fulfilled 10 out of 11 Alzheimer's Disease International quality criteria for prevalence studies. It relied on cross-culturally validated methods, fostering a wide comparability of results. Therefore, we can provide rough estimates of 217,549 community dwellers with dementia in Portugal according to the 10/66 DRG criteria (that would be only 85,162 according to DSM-IV criteria). This refers to people aged 65 years or older who are not institutionalized. Although broadly consistent with international projections, these estimates must be cautiously interpreted. Particularly in the context of scarce funding, which will probably last for years, we need more efficient, evidence-based dementia policies. Concerning further epidemiological studies, high-quality methods are needed but also their comparability potential should be improved at national and international levels. Most of all, fund allocation in Portugal should now privilege routine dementia information systems in both health and social services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Portuguese Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"58-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320114/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Portuguese Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000516503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portuguese Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000516503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

痴呆症构成了重大的公共卫生挑战,服务规划需要高质量的流行病学数据。在大多数情况下,已公布的葡萄牙痴呆症患者人数估计数是基于国际研究或专家共识得出的患病率。与许多其他国家一样,葡萄牙社区患病率研究的结果不能推广到国家层面。此外,它们的患病率估计值不同(这并不奇怪,这是由于不同的方法,例如设计、抽样和诊断标准)。无论如何,葡萄牙10/66痴呆症研究小组(10/66 DRG)基于人群的调查满足了11项阿尔茨海默病国际患病率研究质量标准中的10项。它依赖于跨文化验证的方法,促进了结果的广泛可比性。因此,根据10/66 DRG标准,我们可以粗略估计葡萄牙有217,549名社区居民患有痴呆症(根据DSM-IV标准,只有85,162人)。这指的是65岁以上的老人,他们没有被收容。虽然这些估计与国际预测大体一致,但必须谨慎解释。特别是在资金短缺的情况下,这种情况可能会持续数年,我们需要更有效的、以证据为基础的痴呆症政策。关于进一步的流行病学研究,需要高质量的方法,但也应提高其在国家和国际一级的可比性潜力。最重要的是,葡萄牙的资金分配现在应该优先考虑卫生和社会服务领域的常规痴呆症信息系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Many People Live with Dementia in Portugal? A Discussion Paper of National Estimates.

Dementia poses major public health challenges, and high-quality epidemiological data are needed for service planning. Published estimates of numbers of people with dementia in Portugal have been based, in most cases, on prevalence rates derived from international studies or expert consensus. As in many other countries, Portuguese community prevalence studies' results are nongeneralizable to a country level. Moreover, their prevalence estimates differ (not surprisingly, owing to different methodologies, e.g., design, sampling, and diagnostic criteria). Regardless, the Portuguese 10/66 Dementia Research Group (10/66 DRG) population-based survey fulfilled 10 out of 11 Alzheimer's Disease International quality criteria for prevalence studies. It relied on cross-culturally validated methods, fostering a wide comparability of results. Therefore, we can provide rough estimates of 217,549 community dwellers with dementia in Portugal according to the 10/66 DRG criteria (that would be only 85,162 according to DSM-IV criteria). This refers to people aged 65 years or older who are not institutionalized. Although broadly consistent with international projections, these estimates must be cautiously interpreted. Particularly in the context of scarce funding, which will probably last for years, we need more efficient, evidence-based dementia policies. Concerning further epidemiological studies, high-quality methods are needed but also their comparability potential should be improved at national and international levels. Most of all, fund allocation in Portugal should now privilege routine dementia information systems in both health and social services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Portuguese Journal of Public Health
Portuguese Journal of Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
55 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信