扩展语境下的人力资源开发理论化现状综述

IF 4.6 3区管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT

Human Resource Development Review Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1177/15344843231189318

Sami Jabarkhail

{"title":"扩展语境下的人力资源开发理论化现状综述","authors":"Sami Jabarkhail","doi":"10.1177/15344843231189318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I examine and evaluate the human resource development (HRD) theorization presented by Wang and Doty (2022a), as well as the reactions it received from Russ-Eft (2022), Yoon (2022), and Poell (2022), and the response provided by Wang and Doty (2022b). I observe that the principal criticism of the current HRD framework proposed by Wang and Doty revolves around the significance of culture within the host institution system (HIS). They argue that culture holds little to no importance in the HIS. However, upon examining the definition of HIS presented in this paper, it becomes apparent that the role of culture cannot be easily dismissed in any discussion pertaining to HIS, thereby calling for further theorizing and research. The suggestions put forth in this article have the potential to contribute to the advancement of the current theorization into a genuinely dynamic framework for the HRD discipline.","PeriodicalId":51474,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Development Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"451 - 469"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The State of Theorizing Human Resource Development (HRD) in Extended Context: A Review\",\"authors\":\"Sami Jabarkhail\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15344843231189318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I examine and evaluate the human resource development (HRD) theorization presented by Wang and Doty (2022a), as well as the reactions it received from Russ-Eft (2022), Yoon (2022), and Poell (2022), and the response provided by Wang and Doty (2022b). I observe that the principal criticism of the current HRD framework proposed by Wang and Doty revolves around the significance of culture within the host institution system (HIS). They argue that culture holds little to no importance in the HIS. However, upon examining the definition of HIS presented in this paper, it becomes apparent that the role of culture cannot be easily dismissed in any discussion pertaining to HIS, thereby calling for further theorizing and research. The suggestions put forth in this article have the potential to contribute to the advancement of the current theorization into a genuinely dynamic framework for the HRD discipline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Resource Development Review\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"451 - 469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Resource Development Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843231189318\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843231189318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

在这篇文章中，我考察和评估了王和多蒂（2022a）提出的人力资源开发（HRD）理论，以及从Russ Eft（2022）、Yoon（2022）和Poell（2022）那里得到的反应，以及王和多提（2022b）提供的回应。我观察到，王和多蒂提出的对当前人力资源开发框架的主要批评围绕着东道国制度（HIS）中文化的意义。他们认为文化在HIS中几乎没有重要性。然而，通过研究本文中提出的HIS的定义，很明显，在任何与HIS有关的讨论中，文化的作用都不能轻易被忽视，因此需要进一步的理论化和研究。本文提出的建议有可能有助于将当前的理论化推进为人力资源开发学科的真正动态框架。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The State of Theorizing Human Resource Development (HRD) in Extended Context: A Review

In this article, I examine and evaluate the human resource development (HRD) theorization presented by Wang and Doty (2022a), as well as the reactions it received from Russ-Eft (2022), Yoon (2022), and Poell (2022), and the response provided by Wang and Doty (2022b). I observe that the principal criticism of the current HRD framework proposed by Wang and Doty revolves around the significance of culture within the host institution system (HIS). They argue that culture holds little to no importance in the HIS. However, upon examining the definition of HIS presented in this paper, it becomes apparent that the role of culture cannot be easily dismissed in any discussion pertaining to HIS, thereby calling for further theorizing and research. The suggestions put forth in this article have the potential to contribute to the advancement of the current theorization into a genuinely dynamic framework for the HRD discipline.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Human Resource Development Review MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

9.60

自引率

17.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： As described elsewhere, Human Resource Development Review is a theory development journal for scholars of human resource development and related disciplines. Human Resource Development Review publishes articles that make theoretical contributions on theory development, foundations of HRD, theory building methods, and integrative reviews of the relevant literature. Papers whose central focus is empirical findings, including empirical method and design are not considered for publication in Human Resource Development Review. This journal encourages submissions that provide new theoretical insights to advance our understanding of human resource development and related disciplines. Such papers may include syntheses of existing bodies of theory, new substantive theories, exploratory conceptual models, taxonomies and typology developed as foundations for theory, treatises in formal theory construction, papers on the history of theory, critique of theory that includes alternative research propositions, metatheory, and integrative literature reviews with strong theoretical implications. Papers addressing foundations of HRD might address philosophies of HRD, historical foundations, definitions of the field, conceptual organization of the field, and ethical foundations. Human Resource Development Review takes a multi-paradigm view of theory building so submissions from different paradigms are encouraged.