利比亚革命历史及其余波的出生数字资源

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Libyan Studies Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.1017/lis.2020.16
C. R. Pennell
{"title":"利比亚革命历史及其余波的出生数字资源","authors":"C. R. Pennell","doi":"10.1017/lis.2020.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Archival material on the Libyan revolution and the civil war that followed is very scarce. This article discusses two born digital collections – the Libya Uprising Archive of tweets collected during the rising against Qaddafi, and the collections of asylum appeal tribunals in several English-speaking liberal democracies. Neither collection has been extensively used. It describes how the collections were formed, and the difficulties of using them and, for each, provides a short case study to illustrate these points. For the Libya Uprising Archive the case study is of tweets put out on the day Qaddafi was killed (20 October 2011), for the asylum tribunals the case study is of evidence provided by claimants about the importance or otherwise of tribalism as a factor that put individuals in danger.","PeriodicalId":40059,"journal":{"name":"Libyan Studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"61 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/lis.2020.16","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Born-digital sources for the history of the Libyan revolution and its aftermath\",\"authors\":\"C. R. Pennell\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/lis.2020.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Archival material on the Libyan revolution and the civil war that followed is very scarce. This article discusses two born digital collections – the Libya Uprising Archive of tweets collected during the rising against Qaddafi, and the collections of asylum appeal tribunals in several English-speaking liberal democracies. Neither collection has been extensively used. It describes how the collections were formed, and the difficulties of using them and, for each, provides a short case study to illustrate these points. For the Libya Uprising Archive the case study is of tweets put out on the day Qaddafi was killed (20 October 2011), for the asylum tribunals the case study is of evidence provided by claimants about the importance or otherwise of tribalism as a factor that put individuals in danger.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Libyan Studies\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"61 - 73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/lis.2020.16\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Libyan Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/lis.2020.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libyan Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/lis.2020.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于利比亚革命及其后的内战的档案资料非常稀少。这篇文章讨论了两个诞生的数字集合——利比亚起义档案馆收集的反对卡扎菲起义期间的推文,以及几个说英语的自由民主国家的庇护上诉法庭的集合。这两个集合都没有被广泛使用。它描述了集合是如何形成的,以及使用它们的困难,并为每个集合提供了一个简短的案例研究来说明这些要点。对于利比亚起义档案馆来说,案例研究是卡扎菲被杀当天(2011年10月20日)发布的推特,对于庇护法庭来说,案例研究是由索赔人提供的证据,证明部落主义的重要性或其他因素是将个人置于危险之中的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Born-digital sources for the history of the Libyan revolution and its aftermath
Abstract Archival material on the Libyan revolution and the civil war that followed is very scarce. This article discusses two born digital collections – the Libya Uprising Archive of tweets collected during the rising against Qaddafi, and the collections of asylum appeal tribunals in several English-speaking liberal democracies. Neither collection has been extensively used. It describes how the collections were formed, and the difficulties of using them and, for each, provides a short case study to illustrate these points. For the Libya Uprising Archive the case study is of tweets put out on the day Qaddafi was killed (20 October 2011), for the asylum tribunals the case study is of evidence provided by claimants about the importance or otherwise of tribalism as a factor that put individuals in danger.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Libyan Studies
Libyan Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信