弱势群体社交网络访谈和地图绘制的特殊考虑

IF 1.1 3区社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY

Field Methods Pub Date : 2021-02-04 DOI:10.1177/1525822X21989843

M. Smith, Rohini Pahwa

{"title":"弱势群体社交网络访谈和地图绘制的特殊考虑","authors":"M. Smith, Rohini Pahwa","doi":"10.1177/1525822X21989843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This short take describes the process of enhancing social network interviews with qualitative inquiry to facilitate participant recall, contextualize participant–alter relationships, and increase cultural responsiveness with populations with cognitive impairments. The authors illustrate this process, including the use of a qualitative interviewing name generator, with an example of a mixed-methods project exploring community experiences with adults with serious mental illnesses.","PeriodicalId":48060,"journal":{"name":"Field Methods","volume":"33 1","pages":"424 - 430"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1525822X21989843","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special Considerations in Social Network Interviewing and Mapping with Vulnerable Populations\",\"authors\":\"M. Smith, Rohini Pahwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1525822X21989843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This short take describes the process of enhancing social network interviews with qualitative inquiry to facilitate participant recall, contextualize participant–alter relationships, and increase cultural responsiveness with populations with cognitive impairments. The authors illustrate this process, including the use of a qualitative interviewing name generator, with an example of a mixed-methods project exploring community experiences with adults with serious mental illnesses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Field Methods\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"424 - 430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1525822X21989843\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Field Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X21989843\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Methods","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X21989843","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇短文描述了通过定性调查加强社会网络访谈的过程，以促进参与者回忆，将参与者-改变关系的背景化，并增加对认知障碍人群的文化反应。作者举例说明了这一过程，包括使用定性访谈名字生成器，并以一个混合方法项目为例，探索患有严重精神疾病的成年人的社区经验。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Special Considerations in Social Network Interviewing and Mapping with Vulnerable Populations

This short take describes the process of enhancing social network interviews with qualitative inquiry to facilitate participant recall, contextualize participant–alter relationships, and increase cultural responsiveness with populations with cognitive impairments. The authors illustrate this process, including the use of a qualitative interviewing name generator, with an example of a mixed-methods project exploring community experiences with adults with serious mental illnesses.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Field Methods Multiple-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

5.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： Field Methods (formerly Cultural Anthropology Methods) is devoted to articles about the methods used by field wzorkers in the social and behavioral sciences and humanities for the collection, management, and analysis data about human thought and/or human behavior in the natural world. Articles should focus on innovations and issues in the methods used, rather than on the reporting of research or theoretical/epistemological questions about research. High-quality articles using qualitative and quantitative methods-- from scientific or interpretative traditions-- dealing with data collection and analysis in applied and scholarly research from writers in the social sciences, humanities, and related professions are all welcome in the pages of the journal.