编辑器的介绍

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Brian Smith, Jennifer Cross, Simon P. Philbin
{"title":"编辑器的介绍","authors":"Brian Smith, Jennifer Cross, Simon P. Philbin","doi":"10.1080/10429247.2023.2206765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The idea of hegemony, in its Gramscian sense, contributed to the renewal of several fields of social sciences in the 1970s and 1980s. This idea circulates between different geocultural spaces and different times. The approach adopted in this article starts from the contexts in which this idea is mobilized in order to show to which theoretical and practical stakes it answers. Focusing on four authors (Antonio Gramsci, Ernesto Laclau, Chantal Mouffe, and Pablo Iglesias) and on the transfers from one author to another, the aim of this paper is to highlight the social conditions conducive to the deployment of the idea of Gramscian hegemony and to identify the (dis)continuities that punctuate its history. Throughout the socio-historical course marked out by the written productions of these four authors, one constant appears: the vitality of the concept of hegemony seems linked to periods of crisis— theoretical and / or strategic—of the Left.","PeriodicalId":54353,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Management Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"101 - 101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editor’s Introduction\",\"authors\":\"Brian Smith, Jennifer Cross, Simon P. Philbin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10429247.2023.2206765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The idea of hegemony, in its Gramscian sense, contributed to the renewal of several fields of social sciences in the 1970s and 1980s. This idea circulates between different geocultural spaces and different times. The approach adopted in this article starts from the contexts in which this idea is mobilized in order to show to which theoretical and practical stakes it answers. Focusing on four authors (Antonio Gramsci, Ernesto Laclau, Chantal Mouffe, and Pablo Iglesias) and on the transfers from one author to another, the aim of this paper is to highlight the social conditions conducive to the deployment of the idea of Gramscian hegemony and to identify the (dis)continuities that punctuate its history. Throughout the socio-historical course marked out by the written productions of these four authors, one constant appears: the vitality of the concept of hegemony seems linked to periods of crisis— theoretical and / or strategic—of the Left.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2023.2206765\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2023.2206765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:20世纪70年代和80年代,葛兰主义意义上的霸权思想对社会科学的几个领域的更新做出了贡献。这种思想在不同的地理文化空间和不同的时代之间循环。本文采用的方法从调动这一想法的背景出发,以表明它在理论和实践上的利害关系。本文以四位作者(Antonio Gramsci、Ernesto Laclau、Chantal Mouffe和Pablo Iglesias)以及从一位作者到另一位作者的转移为中心,旨在强调有利于葛兰西霸权思想部署的社会条件,并确定贯穿其历史的(dis)连续性。在这四位作者的书面作品所描绘的整个社会历史进程中,有一个不变的现象出现了:霸权概念的生命力似乎与左翼的危机时期——理论和/或战略时期——有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editor’s Introduction
Abstract:The idea of hegemony, in its Gramscian sense, contributed to the renewal of several fields of social sciences in the 1970s and 1980s. This idea circulates between different geocultural spaces and different times. The approach adopted in this article starts from the contexts in which this idea is mobilized in order to show to which theoretical and practical stakes it answers. Focusing on four authors (Antonio Gramsci, Ernesto Laclau, Chantal Mouffe, and Pablo Iglesias) and on the transfers from one author to another, the aim of this paper is to highlight the social conditions conducive to the deployment of the idea of Gramscian hegemony and to identify the (dis)continuities that punctuate its history. Throughout the socio-historical course marked out by the written productions of these four authors, one constant appears: the vitality of the concept of hegemony seems linked to periods of crisis— theoretical and / or strategic—of the Left.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Management Journal
Engineering Management Journal 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: EMJ is designed to provide practical, pertinent knowledge on the management of technology, technical professionals, and technical organizations. EMJ strives to provide value to the practice of engineering management and engineering managers. EMJ is an archival journal that facilitates both practitioners and university faculty in publishing useful articles. The primary focus is on articles that improve the practice of engineering management. To support the practice of engineering management, EMJ publishes papers within key engineering management content areas. EMJ Editors will continue to refine these areas to ensure they are aligned with the challenges faced by technical organizations and technical managers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信