逻辑、正当性和规范性

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY
Natalia Buacar
{"title":"逻辑、正当性和规范性","authors":"Natalia Buacar","doi":"10.36446/AF.2020.431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alberto Moretti “La logica y la trama de las cosas” presents and defends a conception of logic according to which there are logical principles that structure language and, consequently, the world. This way of understanding logic offers an answer to the problem of its normativity, at the same time that it dissolves the problem of its justification. In this work, I critically analyze this view of logic and propose an alternative conception that vindicates the legitimacy of both problems and gives them a satisfactory solution.","PeriodicalId":40940,"journal":{"name":"Analisis Filosofico","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lógica, justificación y normatividad\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Buacar\",\"doi\":\"10.36446/AF.2020.431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Alberto Moretti “La logica y la trama de las cosas” presents and defends a conception of logic according to which there are logical principles that structure language and, consequently, the world. This way of understanding logic offers an answer to the problem of its normativity, at the same time that it dissolves the problem of its justification. In this work, I critically analyze this view of logic and propose an alternative conception that vindicates the legitimacy of both problems and gives them a satisfactory solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analisis Filosofico\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analisis Filosofico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36446/AF.2020.431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analisis Filosofico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36446/AF.2020.431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿尔贝托·莫雷蒂的《La logica y La trama de las cosas》提出并捍卫了一种逻辑概念,根据这种逻辑概念,有逻辑原则来构建语言,从而构建世界。这种理解逻辑的方式为逻辑的规范性问题提供了答案,同时也解决了逻辑的正当性问题。在这项工作中,我批判性地分析了这种逻辑观点,并提出了另一种概念,证明了这两个问题的合法性,并给出了令人满意的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lógica, justificación y normatividad
Alberto Moretti “La logica y la trama de las cosas” presents and defends a conception of logic according to which there are logical principles that structure language and, consequently, the world. This way of understanding logic offers an answer to the problem of its normativity, at the same time that it dissolves the problem of its justification. In this work, I critically analyze this view of logic and propose an alternative conception that vindicates the legitimacy of both problems and gives them a satisfactory solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analisis Filosofico
Analisis Filosofico PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Análisis Filosófico is an open access scientific journal issued by the Argentine Society of Philosophical Analysis (SADAF). Since 1981, it offers original and unpublished papers on theoretical and practical philosophy, discussions, critical studies and reviews –in Spanish, English and Portuguese– that contribute to the development of philosophical analysis. Essential conditions for publication are conceptual accuracy, precision and novelty. Its refereeing policy is based on double-blind reviews and external assessment. It is launched twice a year on May and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信