将XBRL用作自动化行业分析

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
A. Suta, Á. Tóth
{"title":"将XBRL用作自动化行业分析","authors":"A. Suta, Á. Tóth","doi":"10.33927/hjic-2020-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last two decades, electronic financial reporting went through a significant evolution, where to date, eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) has become the leading platform that is already obligatory for listed entities in the United States and was also legislated in the European Union from January 1, 2020. The primary objective of this research was to review the US-listed companies’ 2018 quarterly reports. The study generated an automated industry analysis for the automotive industry from the aspect of four main financial item categories as an alternative to statistics-based, man-ually prepared industry analyses. Statistical tests were carried out between two industrial classification methodologies, the securities’ industry identification marks and the reported Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes. The results showed a significant difference between the industry classification methodologies. Automated reporting was more pre-cise with regard to the identification of the listed and reporting entities, however, the data fields of SIC codes within the XBRL data set provided an inaccurate classification, which is a potential area of improvement along with additional recommendations outlined in the Conclusion.","PeriodicalId":43118,"journal":{"name":"Hungarian Journal of Industry and Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"XBRL utilization as an automated industry analysis\",\"authors\":\"A. Suta, Á. Tóth\",\"doi\":\"10.33927/hjic-2020-19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last two decades, electronic financial reporting went through a significant evolution, where to date, eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) has become the leading platform that is already obligatory for listed entities in the United States and was also legislated in the European Union from January 1, 2020. The primary objective of this research was to review the US-listed companies’ 2018 quarterly reports. The study generated an automated industry analysis for the automotive industry from the aspect of four main financial item categories as an alternative to statistics-based, man-ually prepared industry analyses. Statistical tests were carried out between two industrial classification methodologies, the securities’ industry identification marks and the reported Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes. The results showed a significant difference between the industry classification methodologies. Automated reporting was more pre-cise with regard to the identification of the listed and reporting entities, however, the data fields of SIC codes within the XBRL data set provided an inaccurate classification, which is a potential area of improvement along with additional recommendations outlined in the Conclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hungarian Journal of Industry and Chemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hungarian Journal of Industry and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33927/hjic-2020-19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hungarian Journal of Industry and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33927/hjic-2020-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的二十年里,电子财务报告经历了重大的发展,到目前为止,可扩展商业报告语言(XBRL)已经成为美国上市实体的强制性平台,并且从2020年1月1日起在欧盟也被立法。本研究的主要目的是回顾2018年美国上市公司的季度报告。该研究从四个主要财务项目类别的角度为汽车行业生成了一个自动化的行业分析,作为基于统计的、人工准备的行业分析的替代方案。对两种行业分类方法、证券行业识别标志和报告的标准行业分类(SIC)代码进行了统计检验。结果表明,行业分类方法之间存在显著差异。自动报告在识别列出的实体和报告实体方面更加精确,然而,XBRL数据集中SIC代码的数据字段提供了不准确的分类,这是一个潜在的改进领域,并在结论中概述了其他建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
XBRL utilization as an automated industry analysis
In the last two decades, electronic financial reporting went through a significant evolution, where to date, eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) has become the leading platform that is already obligatory for listed entities in the United States and was also legislated in the European Union from January 1, 2020. The primary objective of this research was to review the US-listed companies’ 2018 quarterly reports. The study generated an automated industry analysis for the automotive industry from the aspect of four main financial item categories as an alternative to statistics-based, man-ually prepared industry analyses. Statistical tests were carried out between two industrial classification methodologies, the securities’ industry identification marks and the reported Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes. The results showed a significant difference between the industry classification methodologies. Automated reporting was more pre-cise with regard to the identification of the listed and reporting entities, however, the data fields of SIC codes within the XBRL data set provided an inaccurate classification, which is a potential area of improvement along with additional recommendations outlined in the Conclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信