基于价值的医疗保健:调整工具和方法(文献综述)

Q4 Medicine
N. Kamynina, N. Polishchuk
{"title":"基于价值的医疗保健:调整工具和方法(文献综述)","authors":"N. Kamynina, N. Polishchuk","doi":"10.47470/0044-197x-2022-66-6-444-450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The desire to solve the problem of efficient spending of funds in the public sector has been transformed into an understanding of values. The desire to reduce costs, maintain the proper quality and maximize the availability of medical care led to the emergence and formation of a new concept of effective functioning based on values - VBHC (Value-based Health Care). Purpose. To systematize the criteria, metrics and methods for evaluating effectiveness in the context of the VHBC concept. To obtain the necessary information, a selective literature review was carried out. Electronic bibliographic databases in Russian (“RSCI/eLibrary”) and English (“Pubmed”) were used. Search queries were formed taking into account the MeSH nomenclature. To determine the effectiveness of the provision of medical services and the implementation of government programs (projects) in general, there are a number of methods. First of all, it is an analysis of costs, benefits, effectiveness and benefits. The most applicable performance measure is Quality Adjusted Life Years. QALY is a universal indicator of any health program. This expression of “utility” is by default the ultimate goal (final target unofficial indicator) of any government management decision in health care. Assessing the effectiveness of health care and developing a value-based model of health care through cost-benefit analysis is a time-consuming and important task. The study showed that it is necessary to use multidimensional tools for assessing the effectiveness of medical care. Conclusions. As a result of the review, it was found that there is no unified information system that offers ready-made assessment tools, and metrics have not been developed to evaluate the effectiveness of value-based healthcare VBHC models. It seems possible to create a checklist with universal parameters, implement it into a ready-made information system available on the market today to any medical institution, and analyze the effectiveness of the VBHC model based on the developed checklist.","PeriodicalId":39241,"journal":{"name":"Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniia RSFSR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value-based health care: alignment the tools and methods (literature review)\",\"authors\":\"N. Kamynina, N. Polishchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.47470/0044-197x-2022-66-6-444-450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The desire to solve the problem of efficient spending of funds in the public sector has been transformed into an understanding of values. The desire to reduce costs, maintain the proper quality and maximize the availability of medical care led to the emergence and formation of a new concept of effective functioning based on values - VBHC (Value-based Health Care). Purpose. To systematize the criteria, metrics and methods for evaluating effectiveness in the context of the VHBC concept. To obtain the necessary information, a selective literature review was carried out. Electronic bibliographic databases in Russian (“RSCI/eLibrary”) and English (“Pubmed”) were used. Search queries were formed taking into account the MeSH nomenclature. To determine the effectiveness of the provision of medical services and the implementation of government programs (projects) in general, there are a number of methods. First of all, it is an analysis of costs, benefits, effectiveness and benefits. The most applicable performance measure is Quality Adjusted Life Years. QALY is a universal indicator of any health program. This expression of “utility” is by default the ultimate goal (final target unofficial indicator) of any government management decision in health care. Assessing the effectiveness of health care and developing a value-based model of health care through cost-benefit analysis is a time-consuming and important task. The study showed that it is necessary to use multidimensional tools for assessing the effectiveness of medical care. Conclusions. As a result of the review, it was found that there is no unified information system that offers ready-made assessment tools, and metrics have not been developed to evaluate the effectiveness of value-based healthcare VBHC models. It seems possible to create a checklist with universal parameters, implement it into a ready-made information system available on the market today to any medical institution, and analyze the effectiveness of the VBHC model based on the developed checklist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniia RSFSR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniia RSFSR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47470/0044-197x-2022-66-6-444-450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniia RSFSR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47470/0044-197x-2022-66-6-444-450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解决公共部门资金有效支出问题的愿望已转变为对价值观的理解。降低成本、保持适当质量和最大限度地提高医疗服务可用性的愿望导致了基于价值观的有效功能新概念的出现和形成——VBHC(基于价值的医疗保健)。意图系统化VHBC概念背景下评估有效性的标准、指标和方法。为了获得必要的信息,进行了选择性的文献综述。使用了俄语(“RSCI/eLibrary”)和英语(“Pubmed”)的电子书目数据库。搜索查询是在考虑MeSH命名法的情况下形成的。要确定提供医疗服务的有效性和政府计划(项目)的实施情况,通常有多种方法。首先,它是对成本、效益、有效性和效益的分析。最适用的绩效衡量标准是质量调整寿命。QALY是任何健康计划的通用指标。默认情况下,“效用”的表达是任何政府医疗保健管理决策的最终目标(最终目标非官方指标)。通过成本效益分析评估医疗保健的有效性和开发基于价值的医疗保健模式是一项耗时且重要的任务。研究表明,有必要使用多层面的工具来评估医疗保健的有效性。结论。审查结果发现,没有一个统一的信息系统提供现成的评估工具,也没有制定指标来评估基于价值的医疗保健VBHC模型的有效性。似乎可以创建一个具有通用参数的检查表,将其实施到当今市场上任何医疗机构都可以使用的现成信息系统中,并根据开发的检查表分析VBHC模型的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Value-based health care: alignment the tools and methods (literature review)
The desire to solve the problem of efficient spending of funds in the public sector has been transformed into an understanding of values. The desire to reduce costs, maintain the proper quality and maximize the availability of medical care led to the emergence and formation of a new concept of effective functioning based on values - VBHC (Value-based Health Care). Purpose. To systematize the criteria, metrics and methods for evaluating effectiveness in the context of the VHBC concept. To obtain the necessary information, a selective literature review was carried out. Electronic bibliographic databases in Russian (“RSCI/eLibrary”) and English (“Pubmed”) were used. Search queries were formed taking into account the MeSH nomenclature. To determine the effectiveness of the provision of medical services and the implementation of government programs (projects) in general, there are a number of methods. First of all, it is an analysis of costs, benefits, effectiveness and benefits. The most applicable performance measure is Quality Adjusted Life Years. QALY is a universal indicator of any health program. This expression of “utility” is by default the ultimate goal (final target unofficial indicator) of any government management decision in health care. Assessing the effectiveness of health care and developing a value-based model of health care through cost-benefit analysis is a time-consuming and important task. The study showed that it is necessary to use multidimensional tools for assessing the effectiveness of medical care. Conclusions. As a result of the review, it was found that there is no unified information system that offers ready-made assessment tools, and metrics have not been developed to evaluate the effectiveness of value-based healthcare VBHC models. It seems possible to create a checklist with universal parameters, implement it into a ready-made information system available on the market today to any medical institution, and analyze the effectiveness of the VBHC model based on the developed checklist.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信