约旦和澳大利亚放射科医生阅读同一组测试筛选病例的准确性

IF 0.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY

Breast Cancer Management Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.2217/bmt-2018-0021

M. Rawashdeh, M. Abdelrahman, M. Zaitoun, M. Suleiman, Rula Abu Taimai, T. Nusairat, P. Brennan

{"title":"约旦和澳大利亚放射科医生阅读同一组测试筛选病例的准确性","authors":"M. Rawashdeh, M. Abdelrahman, M. Zaitoun, M. Suleiman, Rula Abu Taimai, T. Nusairat, P. Brennan","doi":"10.2217/bmt-2018-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To investigate how breast radiologists from Jordan and Australia differ in accuracy when examining the set of test screening cases. Materials & methods: A total of 27 Jordanian and 115 Australian breast radiologists were requested to read 60 mammographic images and to indicate the location of any perceived lesion and record a confidence level ranging from 1 to 5. Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic, location sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared for both Australian and Jordanian readers. Results: Australian readers achieved significantly higher readings accuracy than Jordanian readers retrospectively in terms of Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (75th percentile values: 0.863 vs 0.600; p = 0.001) and location sensitivity (75th percentile values 0.673 vs 0.571; p = 0.022). Conclusion: Australian radiologists achieved higher performance in reading breast mammograms than Jordanian radiologists.","PeriodicalId":43086,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/bmt-2018-0021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy among Jordanian and Australian radiologists reading the same set of test screening cases\",\"authors\":\"M. Rawashdeh, M. Abdelrahman, M. Zaitoun, M. Suleiman, Rula Abu Taimai, T. Nusairat, P. Brennan\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/bmt-2018-0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To investigate how breast radiologists from Jordan and Australia differ in accuracy when examining the set of test screening cases. Materials & methods: A total of 27 Jordanian and 115 Australian breast radiologists were requested to read 60 mammographic images and to indicate the location of any perceived lesion and record a confidence level ranging from 1 to 5. Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic, location sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared for both Australian and Jordanian readers. Results: Australian readers achieved significantly higher readings accuracy than Jordanian readers retrospectively in terms of Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (75th percentile values: 0.863 vs 0.600; p = 0.001) and location sensitivity (75th percentile values 0.673 vs 0.571; p = 0.022). Conclusion: Australian radiologists achieved higher performance in reading breast mammograms than Jordanian radiologists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/bmt-2018-0021\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/bmt-2018-0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/bmt-2018-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查来自约旦和澳大利亚的乳腺放射科医生在检查一组测试筛查病例时的准确性差异。材料与方法:共有27名约旦和115名澳大利亚乳腺放射科医生被要求阅读60张乳房x线照片，并指出任何感知到的病变的位置，并记录从1到5的置信水平。计算并比较了澳大利亚和约旦读者的刀切式自由反应受体工作特性、定位敏感性和特异性。结果:在Jackknife可选自由反应接受者操作特征方面，澳大利亚读者的阅读准确性显著高于约旦读者(第75百分位值:0.863 vs 0.600;P = 0.001)和位置敏感性(第75百分位值0.673 vs 0.571;p = 0.022)。结论:澳大利亚放射科医生在阅读乳房x光片方面的表现优于约旦放射科医生。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Accuracy among Jordanian and Australian radiologists reading the same set of test screening cases

Aim: To investigate how breast radiologists from Jordan and Australia differ in accuracy when examining the set of test screening cases. Materials & methods: A total of 27 Jordanian and 115 Australian breast radiologists were requested to read 60 mammographic images and to indicate the location of any perceived lesion and record a confidence level ranging from 1 to 5. Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic, location sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared for both Australian and Jordanian readers. Results: Australian readers achieved significantly higher readings accuracy than Jordanian readers retrospectively in terms of Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (75th percentile values: 0.863 vs 0.600; p = 0.001) and location sensitivity (75th percentile values 0.673 vs 0.571; p = 0.022). Conclusion: Australian radiologists achieved higher performance in reading breast mammograms than Jordanian radiologists.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Breast Cancer Management ONCOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

13 weeks

期刊介绍： Breast Cancer Management (ISSN: 1758-1923) addresses key issues in disease management by exploring the best patient-centered clinical research and presenting this information both directly, as clinical findings, and in practice-oriented formats of direct relevance in the clinic. The journal also highlights significant advances in basic and translational research, and places them in context for future therapy. Breast Cancer Management provides oncologists and other health professionals with the latest findings and opinions on reducing the burden of this widespread disease. Recent research findings and advances clinical practice in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts. The journal presents this information in clear, accessible formats. All articles are subject to independent review by a minimum of three independent experts. Unsolicited article proposals are welcomed and authors are required to comply fully with the journal’s Disclosure & Conflict of Interest Policy as well as major publishing guidelines, including ICMJE and GPP3. Coverage includes: Diagnosis and imaging, Surgical approaches, Radiotherapy, Systemic therapies, Cancer clinical trials, Genetic aspects of disease, Personalized medicine, Translational research and biomarker studies, Management of psychological distress, Epidemiological studies, Pharmacoeconomics, Evidence-based treatment guidelines.