家族史研究中的新问题

IF 0.3 Q2 HISTORY
T. Evans
{"title":"家族史研究中的新问题","authors":"T. Evans","doi":"10.1515/iph-2019-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We asked an interdisciplinary group of researchers in family history to respond to a number of key questions about the past, present, and future of family history practice and scholarship. They revealed shared concerns around the devaluing of family history practice and scholarship by academics, the political uses and negative consequences of DNA and genealogical descent – especially with regard to Indigenous peoples, hierarchies of scientific and humanistic knowledge, and numerous barriers to collaboration. Others expressed excitement at the potential benefits of working with heritage institutions and diverse communities on shared projects with enormous creative potential to expand our definition of what history is and what it might be. The responses were initially to the following methodological questions:","PeriodicalId":52352,"journal":{"name":"International Public History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/iph-2019-0013","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emerging questions in family history studies\",\"authors\":\"T. Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/iph-2019-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We asked an interdisciplinary group of researchers in family history to respond to a number of key questions about the past, present, and future of family history practice and scholarship. They revealed shared concerns around the devaluing of family history practice and scholarship by academics, the political uses and negative consequences of DNA and genealogical descent – especially with regard to Indigenous peoples, hierarchies of scientific and humanistic knowledge, and numerous barriers to collaboration. Others expressed excitement at the potential benefits of working with heritage institutions and diverse communities on shared projects with enormous creative potential to expand our definition of what history is and what it might be. The responses were initially to the following methodological questions:\",\"PeriodicalId\":52352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Public History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/iph-2019-0013\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Public History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/iph-2019-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Public History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/iph-2019-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们请一个跨学科的家族史研究小组回答了一些关于家族史实践和学术的过去、现在和未来的关键问题。他们揭示了学术界对家族史实践和学术的贬低、DNA和系谱血统的政治用途和负面后果的共同担忧,尤其是在土著人民、科学和人文知识的等级制度以及合作的众多障碍方面。其他人对与遗产机构和不同社区合作开展具有巨大创造性潜力的共享项目的潜在好处表示兴奋,以扩大我们对什么是历史以及它可能是什么的定义。最初的回答是以下方法论问题:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emerging questions in family history studies
We asked an interdisciplinary group of researchers in family history to respond to a number of key questions about the past, present, and future of family history practice and scholarship. They revealed shared concerns around the devaluing of family history practice and scholarship by academics, the political uses and negative consequences of DNA and genealogical descent – especially with regard to Indigenous peoples, hierarchies of scientific and humanistic knowledge, and numerous barriers to collaboration. Others expressed excitement at the potential benefits of working with heritage institutions and diverse communities on shared projects with enormous creative potential to expand our definition of what history is and what it might be. The responses were initially to the following methodological questions:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Public History
International Public History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信