2016年和平协议后哥伦比亚反对派的政治参与

Julialba Ángel-Osorio, Libia Esperanza Nieto-Gómez, Reinaldo Giraldo-Díaz
{"title":"2016年和平协议后哥伦比亚反对派的政治参与","authors":"Julialba Ángel-Osorio, Libia Esperanza Nieto-Gómez, Reinaldo Giraldo-Díaz","doi":"10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.2.7484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the expectations generated by the Peace Agreement signed in November 2016 between the Colombian Government and the FARC-EP guerrillas was to create the conditions of democratic openness that would allow the conditions for political participation of the opposition. As a working hypothesis it is considered that the Colombian political regime has not provided enough guarantees for the participation and exercise of democracy and that the current government has allowed the conditions of political, social, and armed conflict to be sharpened. The method of analysis adopted is interpretative and inductive, with a focus on the political participation of the opposition in the broad sense. The information obtained was critically analyzed considering the guarantees for the exercise of the opposition, freedom of expression and association and social movements. It was found that social organizations and movements have not achieved significant participation as an opposition and that there is a greater commitment of the now FARC political party to what was agreed in 2016. It is concluded that the Peace Agreement failed to provide enough guarantees for the political participation of the opposition and the exercise of democracy.","PeriodicalId":29647,"journal":{"name":"Entramado","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political participation of the opposition in Colombia after the 2016 Peace Agreement\",\"authors\":\"Julialba Ángel-Osorio, Libia Esperanza Nieto-Gómez, Reinaldo Giraldo-Díaz\",\"doi\":\"10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.2.7484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the expectations generated by the Peace Agreement signed in November 2016 between the Colombian Government and the FARC-EP guerrillas was to create the conditions of democratic openness that would allow the conditions for political participation of the opposition. As a working hypothesis it is considered that the Colombian political regime has not provided enough guarantees for the participation and exercise of democracy and that the current government has allowed the conditions of political, social, and armed conflict to be sharpened. The method of analysis adopted is interpretative and inductive, with a focus on the political participation of the opposition in the broad sense. The information obtained was critically analyzed considering the guarantees for the exercise of the opposition, freedom of expression and association and social movements. It was found that social organizations and movements have not achieved significant participation as an opposition and that there is a greater commitment of the now FARC political party to what was agreed in 2016. It is concluded that the Peace Agreement failed to provide enough guarantees for the political participation of the opposition and the exercise of democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Entramado\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Entramado\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.2.7484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entramado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.2.7484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哥伦比亚政府与哥伦比亚革命武装力量-人民军游击队于2016年11月签署的和平协议所产生的期望之一是创造民主开放的条件,为反对派的政治参与创造条件。作为一种可行的假设,人们认为哥伦比亚的政治政权没有为参与和行使民主提供足够的保障,现任政府允许政治、社会和武装冲突的条件变得更加尖锐。所采用的分析方法是解释性和归纳性的,重点关注广义上的反对派政治参与。考虑到对行使反对权利、言论和结社自由以及社会运动的保障,对所获得的资料进行了批判性分析。调查发现,社会组织和运动并没有作为反对派获得大量参与,现在的哥伦比亚革命武装力量政党对2016年达成的协议有更大的承诺。结论是,《和平协定》未能为反对派的政治参与和行使民主提供足够的保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political participation of the opposition in Colombia after the 2016 Peace Agreement
One of the expectations generated by the Peace Agreement signed in November 2016 between the Colombian Government and the FARC-EP guerrillas was to create the conditions of democratic openness that would allow the conditions for political participation of the opposition. As a working hypothesis it is considered that the Colombian political regime has not provided enough guarantees for the participation and exercise of democracy and that the current government has allowed the conditions of political, social, and armed conflict to be sharpened. The method of analysis adopted is interpretative and inductive, with a focus on the political participation of the opposition in the broad sense. The information obtained was critically analyzed considering the guarantees for the exercise of the opposition, freedom of expression and association and social movements. It was found that social organizations and movements have not achieved significant participation as an opposition and that there is a greater commitment of the now FARC political party to what was agreed in 2016. It is concluded that the Peace Agreement failed to provide enough guarantees for the political participation of the opposition and the exercise of democracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信