美国与印尼法系罢免权或跨时期弹劾机制之比较

I. Pelu
{"title":"美国与印尼法系罢免权或跨时期弹劾机制之比较","authors":"I. Pelu","doi":"10.26532/jph.v9i1.20409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a study of legal thought regarding regulation of the use of recall right or inter-time impeachment as political parties’ authority accommodated in MD3 Law. This recall authority has indirectly harmed the spirit of people’s sovereignty as the embodiment of a democratic state. To study, it was conducted by applying normative research methods (doctrinal research), and other regulations of written legal materials. Furthermore, it was based on three stages in conducting comparative construction, namely: (1) the descriptive phase, (2) the identification phase and (3) the explanatory phase. Based on the results through library research, the researchers found similarities between recall rights accommodated by Indonesia comparing to the implementation in the United States of America. Additionally, this similarity of recall right regulatory system concept can be used as a thought basis for legal constructions based on the actual legal protection of people’s sovereignty in Indonesian laws.","PeriodicalId":34168,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE COMPARISON OF RECALL RIGHT OR AN INTER-TIME IMPEACHMENT MECHANISM BETWEEN AMERICAN AND INDONESIAN LAW SYSTEMS\",\"authors\":\"I. Pelu\",\"doi\":\"10.26532/jph.v9i1.20409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is a study of legal thought regarding regulation of the use of recall right or inter-time impeachment as political parties’ authority accommodated in MD3 Law. This recall authority has indirectly harmed the spirit of people’s sovereignty as the embodiment of a democratic state. To study, it was conducted by applying normative research methods (doctrinal research), and other regulations of written legal materials. Furthermore, it was based on three stages in conducting comparative construction, namely: (1) the descriptive phase, (2) the identification phase and (3) the explanatory phase. Based on the results through library research, the researchers found similarities between recall rights accommodated by Indonesia comparing to the implementation in the United States of America. Additionally, this similarity of recall right regulatory system concept can be used as a thought basis for legal constructions based on the actual legal protection of people’s sovereignty in Indonesian laws.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v9i1.20409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v9i1.20409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是一项关于MD3法中规定罢免权或时间间弹劾作为政党权力的法律思想的研究。这种罢免权间接损害了作为民主国家体现的人民主权的精神。为了进行研究,它采用了规范的研究方法(理论研究)和其他成文法律材料的规定。此外,它是基于三个阶段进行比较建构的,即:(1)描述阶段,(2)识别阶段和(3)解释阶段。根据图书馆研究的结果,研究人员发现,与美国实施召回权相比,印度尼西亚实施的召回权有相似之处。此外,这种召回权监管体系概念的相似性可以作为印尼法律在实际法律保护人民主权的基础上进行法律建构的思想基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE COMPARISON OF RECALL RIGHT OR AN INTER-TIME IMPEACHMENT MECHANISM BETWEEN AMERICAN AND INDONESIAN LAW SYSTEMS
This is a study of legal thought regarding regulation of the use of recall right or inter-time impeachment as political parties’ authority accommodated in MD3 Law. This recall authority has indirectly harmed the spirit of people’s sovereignty as the embodiment of a democratic state. To study, it was conducted by applying normative research methods (doctrinal research), and other regulations of written legal materials. Furthermore, it was based on three stages in conducting comparative construction, namely: (1) the descriptive phase, (2) the identification phase and (3) the explanatory phase. Based on the results through library research, the researchers found similarities between recall rights accommodated by Indonesia comparing to the implementation in the United States of America. Additionally, this similarity of recall right regulatory system concept can be used as a thought basis for legal constructions based on the actual legal protection of people’s sovereignty in Indonesian laws.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信