{"title":"美国在国际商业研究中的霸权是什么?","authors":"Grigorios Livanis, J. Michael Geringer","doi":"10.1002/tie.22333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Researchers have suggested a transition from historical hegemony by authors and institutions from the U.S. is underway, reflecting an internationalization of IB research. These studies indicate that European and Asia-Pacific business schools and their faculty members are helping to lead this transition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This study examines whether U.S. dominance of IB research has truly reached its end, or whether the extent of this transition to non-U.S. authors and institutions has been overstated. To the extent that U.S. hegemony has declined, this study examines what strategies may have assisted non-U.S. nations and their business schools to emerge as leaders in producing IB research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials & Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study employs an in-depth, time-series analysis of the evolution of IB research over a 45-year period, 1976–2020, to examine trends in institutional and national productivity globally.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Despite declines in overall dominance of U.S. authors and institutions, the extent varies by type of journal and U.S. impact remains profound through Ph.D. training and collaboration. In addition, novel findings include the emergence of three distinct business models that non-U.S. institutions have followed to enhance their global rankings in publication of IB research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>We discuss the 3-part typology of strategies by which non-U.S. institutions have enhanced their productivity and international rankings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Key conclusions from the study, including contributions and their implications, are presented along with considerations for further research.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47515,"journal":{"name":"Thunderbird International Business Review","volume":"65 2","pages":"195-215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tie.22333","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"W(h)ither U.S. hegemony in international business research?\",\"authors\":\"Grigorios Livanis, J. Michael Geringer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tie.22333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Researchers have suggested a transition from historical hegemony by authors and institutions from the U.S. is underway, reflecting an internationalization of IB research. These studies indicate that European and Asia-Pacific business schools and their faculty members are helping to lead this transition.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study examines whether U.S. dominance of IB research has truly reached its end, or whether the extent of this transition to non-U.S. authors and institutions has been overstated. To the extent that U.S. hegemony has declined, this study examines what strategies may have assisted non-U.S. nations and their business schools to emerge as leaders in producing IB research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials & Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study employs an in-depth, time-series analysis of the evolution of IB research over a 45-year period, 1976–2020, to examine trends in institutional and national productivity globally.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite declines in overall dominance of U.S. authors and institutions, the extent varies by type of journal and U.S. impact remains profound through Ph.D. training and collaboration. In addition, novel findings include the emergence of three distinct business models that non-U.S. institutions have followed to enhance their global rankings in publication of IB research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We discuss the 3-part typology of strategies by which non-U.S. institutions have enhanced their productivity and international rankings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Key conclusions from the study, including contributions and their implications, are presented along with considerations for further research.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thunderbird International Business Review\",\"volume\":\"65 2\",\"pages\":\"195-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tie.22333\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thunderbird International Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tie.22333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thunderbird International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tie.22333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
W(h)ither U.S. hegemony in international business research?
Background
Researchers have suggested a transition from historical hegemony by authors and institutions from the U.S. is underway, reflecting an internationalization of IB research. These studies indicate that European and Asia-Pacific business schools and their faculty members are helping to lead this transition.
Aims
This study examines whether U.S. dominance of IB research has truly reached its end, or whether the extent of this transition to non-U.S. authors and institutions has been overstated. To the extent that U.S. hegemony has declined, this study examines what strategies may have assisted non-U.S. nations and their business schools to emerge as leaders in producing IB research.
Materials & Methods
This study employs an in-depth, time-series analysis of the evolution of IB research over a 45-year period, 1976–2020, to examine trends in institutional and national productivity globally.
Results
Despite declines in overall dominance of U.S. authors and institutions, the extent varies by type of journal and U.S. impact remains profound through Ph.D. training and collaboration. In addition, novel findings include the emergence of three distinct business models that non-U.S. institutions have followed to enhance their global rankings in publication of IB research.
Discussion
We discuss the 3-part typology of strategies by which non-U.S. institutions have enhanced their productivity and international rankings.
Conclusions
Key conclusions from the study, including contributions and their implications, are presented along with considerations for further research.
期刊介绍：
Thunderbird International Business Review is a peer-reviewed journal that is published six times a year in cooperation with the Thunderbird School of Global Business Management, the world"s leading institution in the education of global managers. The journal"s aim is to advance and disseminate research in the field of international business. Its main target audience includes academicians and executives in business and government who have an interest in international business.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
