《在版画的怀抱中成长》:塞万提斯的狗的对话与gines Carrillo ceron的延续之间的比较研究

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE
Pablo Martín González
{"title":"《在版画的怀抱中成长》:塞万提斯的狗的对话与gines Carrillo ceron的延续之间的比较研究","authors":"Pablo Martín González","doi":"10.3989/anacervantinos.2020.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article offers a comparative study between Cervantes’ Dialogue of the Dogs and Ginés Carrillo Cerón’s 1635 sequel focusing on its three main discrepancies: the omission of the thematic link between The Deceitful Marriage and the Dialogue in the second part, Cervantes and Cerón’s different approach to the picaresque genre and Cerón’s rejection of the marvelous elements from the first Dialogue. These discrepancies not only allow us to reach a better understanding of Cervantes’ text, but also to study the literary and ideological quandaries that readers of the seventeenth century might have faced. * Universidad de Salamanca. pablomarting@usal.es / ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-00024861-5894.","PeriodicalId":42774,"journal":{"name":"ANALES CERVANTINOS","volume":"52 1","pages":"255-281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"«Creciendo en los brazos de la estampa»: estudio comparado entre el Coloquio de los perros de Cervantes y su continuación por Ginés Carrillo Cerón\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Martín González\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/anacervantinos.2020.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article offers a comparative study between Cervantes’ Dialogue of the Dogs and Ginés Carrillo Cerón’s 1635 sequel focusing on its three main discrepancies: the omission of the thematic link between The Deceitful Marriage and the Dialogue in the second part, Cervantes and Cerón’s different approach to the picaresque genre and Cerón’s rejection of the marvelous elements from the first Dialogue. These discrepancies not only allow us to reach a better understanding of Cervantes’ text, but also to study the literary and ideological quandaries that readers of the seventeenth century might have faced. * Universidad de Salamanca. pablomarting@usal.es / ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-00024861-5894.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ANALES CERVANTINOS\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"255-281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ANALES CERVANTINOS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/anacervantinos.2020.010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, ROMANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANALES CERVANTINOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/anacervantinos.2020.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对塞万提斯的《狗的对话》和gin·Carrillo (Cerón) 1635年的续作进行了比较研究,重点分析了它们之间的三个主要差异:第二部《欺骗婚姻》和《对话》之间的主题联系的遗漏,塞万提斯和Cerón对流浪汉小说类型的不同处理方式以及Cerón对第一部《对话》中奇妙元素的拒绝。这些差异不仅能让我们更好地理解塞万提斯的作品,还能让我们研究17世纪读者可能面临的文学和意识形态困境。*萨拉曼卡大学。pablomarting@usal.es / ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-00024861-5894。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
«Creciendo en los brazos de la estampa»: estudio comparado entre el Coloquio de los perros de Cervantes y su continuación por Ginés Carrillo Cerón
This article offers a comparative study between Cervantes’ Dialogue of the Dogs and Ginés Carrillo Cerón’s 1635 sequel focusing on its three main discrepancies: the omission of the thematic link between The Deceitful Marriage and the Dialogue in the second part, Cervantes and Cerón’s different approach to the picaresque genre and Cerón’s rejection of the marvelous elements from the first Dialogue. These discrepancies not only allow us to reach a better understanding of Cervantes’ text, but also to study the literary and ideological quandaries that readers of the seventeenth century might have faced. * Universidad de Salamanca. pablomarting@usal.es / ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-00024861-5894.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ANALES CERVANTINOS
ANALES CERVANTINOS LITERATURE, ROMANCE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信