解决保护实践的限制和减少农田磷损失的权衡

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Peter J. A. Kleinman, Deanna L. Osmond, Laura E. Christianson, Don N. Flaten, James A. Ippolito, Helen P. Jarvie, Jason P. Kaye, Kevin W. King, April B. Leytem, Joshua M. McGrath, Nathan O. Nelson, Amy L. Shober, Douglas R. Smith, Kenneth W. Staver, Andrew N. Sharpley
{"title":"解决保护实践的限制和减少农田磷损失的权衡","authors":"Peter J. A. Kleinman,&nbsp;Deanna L. Osmond,&nbsp;Laura E. Christianson,&nbsp;Don N. Flaten,&nbsp;James A. Ippolito,&nbsp;Helen P. Jarvie,&nbsp;Jason P. Kaye,&nbsp;Kevin W. King,&nbsp;April B. Leytem,&nbsp;Joshua M. McGrath,&nbsp;Nathan O. Nelson,&nbsp;Amy L. Shober,&nbsp;Douglas R. Smith,&nbsp;Kenneth W. Staver,&nbsp;Andrew N. Sharpley","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conservation practices that reduce nutrient and soil loss from agricultural lands to water are fundamental to watershed management programs. Avoiding trade-offs of conservation practices is essential to the successful mitigation of watershed phosphorus (P) losses. We review documented trade-offs associated with conservation practices, particularly those practices that are intended to control and trap P from agricultural sources. A regular theme is the trade-off between controlling P loss linked to sediment while increasing dissolved P losses (no-till, cover crops, vegetated buffers, constructed wetlands, sediment control basins). A variety of factors influence the degree to which these trade-offs occur, complicated by their interaction and uncertainties associated with climate change. However, acknowledging these trade-offs and anticipating their contribution to watershed outcomes are essential to the sustainability of conservation systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20084","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing conservation practice limitations and trade-offs for reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural fields\",\"authors\":\"Peter J. A. Kleinman,&nbsp;Deanna L. Osmond,&nbsp;Laura E. Christianson,&nbsp;Don N. Flaten,&nbsp;James A. Ippolito,&nbsp;Helen P. Jarvie,&nbsp;Jason P. Kaye,&nbsp;Kevin W. King,&nbsp;April B. Leytem,&nbsp;Joshua M. McGrath,&nbsp;Nathan O. Nelson,&nbsp;Amy L. Shober,&nbsp;Douglas R. Smith,&nbsp;Kenneth W. Staver,&nbsp;Andrew N. Sharpley\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ael2.20084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Conservation practices that reduce nutrient and soil loss from agricultural lands to water are fundamental to watershed management programs. Avoiding trade-offs of conservation practices is essential to the successful mitigation of watershed phosphorus (P) losses. We review documented trade-offs associated with conservation practices, particularly those practices that are intended to control and trap P from agricultural sources. A regular theme is the trade-off between controlling P loss linked to sediment while increasing dissolved P losses (no-till, cover crops, vegetated buffers, constructed wetlands, sediment control basins). A variety of factors influence the degree to which these trade-offs occur, complicated by their interaction and uncertainties associated with climate change. However, acknowledging these trade-offs and anticipating their contribution to watershed outcomes are essential to the sustainability of conservation systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural & Environmental Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20084\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural & Environmental Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

减少从农田到水源的养分和土壤损失的保护措施是流域管理计划的基础。避免保护措施的权衡对于成功缓解流域磷损失至关重要。我们审查了与保护实践相关的有记录的权衡,特别是那些旨在控制和捕获农业来源磷的实践。一个常见的主题是控制与沉积物相关的磷损失与增加溶解磷损失(免耕、覆盖作物、植被缓冲区、人工湿地、沉积物控制盆地)之间的权衡。各种因素影响着这些权衡的发生程度,它们之间的相互作用和与气候变化相关的不确定性使其变得复杂。然而,承认这些权衡并预测它们对流域结果的贡献对保护系统的可持续性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Addressing conservation practice limitations and trade-offs for reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural fields

Addressing conservation practice limitations and trade-offs for reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural fields

Conservation practices that reduce nutrient and soil loss from agricultural lands to water are fundamental to watershed management programs. Avoiding trade-offs of conservation practices is essential to the successful mitigation of watershed phosphorus (P) losses. We review documented trade-offs associated with conservation practices, particularly those practices that are intended to control and trap P from agricultural sources. A regular theme is the trade-off between controlling P loss linked to sediment while increasing dissolved P losses (no-till, cover crops, vegetated buffers, constructed wetlands, sediment control basins). A variety of factors influence the degree to which these trade-offs occur, complicated by their interaction and uncertainties associated with climate change. However, acknowledging these trade-offs and anticipating their contribution to watershed outcomes are essential to the sustainability of conservation systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信