解码Erōtes:阿喀琉斯·塔提乌斯的接受与希腊小说的现代性

IF 0.6 1区历史学 0 CLASSICS

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI:10.1353/ajp.2021.0015

Nicolò D’Alconzo

{"title":"解码Erōtes:阿喀琉斯·塔提乌斯的接受与希腊小说的现代性","authors":"Nicolò D’Alconzo","doi":"10.1353/ajp.2021.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article reconfigures the Lucianic Erōtes as an outstanding testimony to the early reception of Achilles Tatius' Leucippe and Clitophon, predating all other early examples of sophisticated readership. The analysis demonstrates the author's extensive remodelling of the novelist's technique of proleptic ekphrasis, and uses it to tease out the literary implications, so far undetected, of the characters' debate on sex preferences. By proposing an evolutionary theory of imitation and putting it into practice, the author inserted the novel in literary history.","PeriodicalId":46128,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoding the Erōtes: Reception of Achilles Tatius and the Modernity of the Greek Novel\",\"authors\":\"Nicolò D’Alconzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ajp.2021.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article reconfigures the Lucianic Erōtes as an outstanding testimony to the early reception of Achilles Tatius' Leucippe and Clitophon, predating all other early examples of sophisticated readership. The analysis demonstrates the author's extensive remodelling of the novelist's technique of proleptic ekphrasis, and uses it to tease out the literary implications, so far undetected, of the characters' debate on sex preferences. By proposing an evolutionary theory of imitation and putting it into practice, the author inserted the novel in literary history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.2021.0015\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.2021.0015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文将《卢西anic》Erōtes重新配置为阿基里斯·塔提乌斯的《留西比》和《克利托丰》早期接受的杰出见证，比其他所有早期成熟读者的例子都要早。分析表明，作者对小说家的预言技巧进行了广泛的重塑，并用它来梳理出迄今未被发现的人物关于性别偏好的辩论的文学含义。通过提出模仿进化理论并付诸实践，作者将小说纳入了文学史。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Decoding the Erōtes: Reception of Achilles Tatius and the Modernity of the Greek Novel

Abstract:This article reconfigures the Lucianic Erōtes as an outstanding testimony to the early reception of Achilles Tatius' Leucippe and Clitophon, predating all other early examples of sophisticated readership. The analysis demonstrates the author's extensive remodelling of the novelist's technique of proleptic ekphrasis, and uses it to tease out the literary implications, so far undetected, of the characters' debate on sex preferences. By proposing an evolutionary theory of imitation and putting it into practice, the author inserted the novel in literary history.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY CLASSICS-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Founded in 1880, American Journal of Philology (AJP) has helped to shape American classical scholarship. Today, the Journal has achieved worldwide recognition as a forum for international exchange among classicists and philologists by publishing original research in classical literature, philology, linguistics, history, society, religion, philosophy, and cultural and material studies. Book review sections are featured in every issue. AJP is open to a wide variety of contemporary and interdisciplinary approaches, including literary interpretation and theory, historical investigation, and textual criticism.