重新定义苏格兰有限合伙法

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Jonathan Hardman
{"title":"重新定义苏格兰有限合伙法","authors":"Jonathan Hardman","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2020.1803784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Scottish limited partnerships (SLPs) have been the focus of much negative attention. Recent developments appear to have slowed the speed of incorporation of new SLPs. However, this article argues that current reforms may not help tackle existing fraudulent SLPs. This does not matter: viewing SLPs as general partnerships with some additional features, arguably fraudulent SLPs have ceased to exist, and offshored SLPs may have lost their separate legal personality. That this has been so far missed can be traced to current organisational theory. This article identifies the implications of reconceptualising the SLP for wider organisational theory and identifies options for state gift thinkers to reformulate their wider claims. Either the claim that separate legal personality derives from the state needs to be diluted to near tautology, or it needs to be limited in geographical extent.","PeriodicalId":44517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","volume":"21 1","pages":"179 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14735970.2020.1803784","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconceptualising Scottish limited partnership law\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Hardman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14735970.2020.1803784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Scottish limited partnerships (SLPs) have been the focus of much negative attention. Recent developments appear to have slowed the speed of incorporation of new SLPs. However, this article argues that current reforms may not help tackle existing fraudulent SLPs. This does not matter: viewing SLPs as general partnerships with some additional features, arguably fraudulent SLPs have ceased to exist, and offshored SLPs may have lost their separate legal personality. That this has been so far missed can be traced to current organisational theory. This article identifies the implications of reconceptualising the SLP for wider organisational theory and identifies options for state gift thinkers to reformulate their wider claims. Either the claim that separate legal personality derives from the state needs to be diluted to near tautology, or it needs to be limited in geographical extent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"179 - 217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14735970.2020.1803784\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2020.1803784\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2020.1803784","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

苏格兰有限合伙企业(slp)一直是负面关注的焦点。最近的事态发展似乎减缓了纳入新的slp的速度。然而,本文认为,目前的改革可能无助于解决现有的欺诈性slp。这并不重要:将slp视为具有一些附加功能的普通合伙企业,可以说欺诈性slp已经不复存在,离岸slp可能已经失去了独立的法人资格。迄今为止,这一点一直被忽视,这可以追溯到当前的组织理论。本文确定了在更广泛的组织理论中重新概念化SLP的含义,并确定了国家礼物思想家重新制定其更广泛主张的选项。法律人格分离源于国家的主张要么需要被稀释到近乎同义反复,要么需要在地理范围上加以限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconceptualising Scottish limited partnership law
ABSTRACT Scottish limited partnerships (SLPs) have been the focus of much negative attention. Recent developments appear to have slowed the speed of incorporation of new SLPs. However, this article argues that current reforms may not help tackle existing fraudulent SLPs. This does not matter: viewing SLPs as general partnerships with some additional features, arguably fraudulent SLPs have ceased to exist, and offshored SLPs may have lost their separate legal personality. That this has been so far missed can be traced to current organisational theory. This article identifies the implications of reconceptualising the SLP for wider organisational theory and identifies options for state gift thinkers to reformulate their wider claims. Either the claim that separate legal personality derives from the state needs to be diluted to near tautology, or it needs to be limited in geographical extent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信