《法弗舍姆的阿登》的作者候选人:基德、莎士比亚和托马斯·沃森

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
B. Vickers
{"title":"《法弗舍姆的阿登》的作者候选人:基德、莎士比亚和托马斯·沃森","authors":"B. Vickers","doi":"10.1353/sip.2021.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In the first half of the twentieth century, five scholars working in four different languages ascribed the anonymous 1592 tragedy Arden of Faversham to Thomas Kyd. Since 1963, however, attribution studies of Arden have been dominated by the influence of MacDonald P. Jackson, who has repeatedly rejected Kyd while attributing sections of the play to William Shakespeare. Thanks to Jackson, the play was included in The New Oxford Shakespeare, and a new search for potential coauthors has nominated a wide range of candidates. The New Oxford Shakespeare's general editor, Gary Taylor, has published two essays claiming Thomas Watson as coauthor of Arden, one based on stylometric evidence and another arguing from literary and theatrical history. In this essay, I evaluate the methods Taylor has used to reach this conclusion and reconsider the merits of the evidence he has deployed, arguing against Watson's authorship of Arden and offering a renewed case for viewing Kyd as the play's author.","PeriodicalId":45500,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/sip.2021.0011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Authorship Candidates for Arden of Faversham: Kyd, Shakespeare, and Thomas Watson\",\"authors\":\"B. Vickers\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sip.2021.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In the first half of the twentieth century, five scholars working in four different languages ascribed the anonymous 1592 tragedy Arden of Faversham to Thomas Kyd. Since 1963, however, attribution studies of Arden have been dominated by the influence of MacDonald P. Jackson, who has repeatedly rejected Kyd while attributing sections of the play to William Shakespeare. Thanks to Jackson, the play was included in The New Oxford Shakespeare, and a new search for potential coauthors has nominated a wide range of candidates. The New Oxford Shakespeare's general editor, Gary Taylor, has published two essays claiming Thomas Watson as coauthor of Arden, one based on stylometric evidence and another arguing from literary and theatrical history. In this essay, I evaluate the methods Taylor has used to reach this conclusion and reconsider the merits of the evidence he has deployed, arguing against Watson's authorship of Arden and offering a renewed case for viewing Kyd as the play's author.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/sip.2021.0011\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2021.0011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2021.0011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:二十世纪上半叶,五位学者用四种不同的语言将1592年法弗舍姆的阿登悲剧归咎于托马斯·基德。然而,自1963年以来,对阿登的归因研究一直受到麦克唐纳·P·杰克逊的影响,他多次拒绝基德,同时将该剧的部分归因于威廉·莎士比亚。多亏了杰克逊,这部剧被收录在《新牛津莎士比亚》中,对潜在合著者的新搜索已经提名了广泛的候选人。《新牛津莎士比亚》的总编辑加里·泰勒发表了两篇文章,声称托马斯·沃森是《阿登》的合著者,一篇基于风格证据,另一篇则从文学和戏剧史上进行论证。在这篇文章中,我评估了泰勒得出这一结论所使用的方法,并重新考虑了他所使用的证据的优点,反对沃森对《阿登》的作者身份,并为将基德视为该剧的作者提供了新的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Authorship Candidates for Arden of Faversham: Kyd, Shakespeare, and Thomas Watson
Abstract:In the first half of the twentieth century, five scholars working in four different languages ascribed the anonymous 1592 tragedy Arden of Faversham to Thomas Kyd. Since 1963, however, attribution studies of Arden have been dominated by the influence of MacDonald P. Jackson, who has repeatedly rejected Kyd while attributing sections of the play to William Shakespeare. Thanks to Jackson, the play was included in The New Oxford Shakespeare, and a new search for potential coauthors has nominated a wide range of candidates. The New Oxford Shakespeare's general editor, Gary Taylor, has published two essays claiming Thomas Watson as coauthor of Arden, one based on stylometric evidence and another arguing from literary and theatrical history. In this essay, I evaluate the methods Taylor has used to reach this conclusion and reconsider the merits of the evidence he has deployed, arguing against Watson's authorship of Arden and offering a renewed case for viewing Kyd as the play's author.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Founded in 1903, Studies in Philology addresses scholars in a wide range of disciplines, though traditionally its strength has been English Medieval and Renaissance studies. SIP publishes articles on British literature before 1900 and on relations between British literature and works in the Classical, Romance, and Germanic Languages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信