共同财产共和国是可能的吗?从Kouroukanfouga到地方自治和返回= (im)可能的共和?从库鲁坎福加到地方自治和回归

IF 0.2 Q4 COMMUNICATION
M. Carducci
{"title":"共同财产共和国是可能的吗?从Kouroukanfouga到地方自治和返回= (im)可能的共和?从库鲁坎福加到地方自治和回归","authors":"M. Carducci","doi":"10.1285/i22840753n11p41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is it (im)possible the Republic of Commons? From Kouroukanfouga to local self-government and return. The article discusses the issue of the Commons government. After analyzing the divergence of perspectives between Private Law and Constitutional Law Scholars, the author focuses on the transition of constitutionalism from the “biochemistry Era” to the “fossil Era” in order to investigate the consequences of this evolution in local democracy experiences. Only in this perspective, it is possible to identify differences and limitations of both theories (like those proposed by Ostrom and Wilson) and of the historical experiences (from the Kouroukanfouga Charter to the Constitution of Ecuador) of the Commons government.","PeriodicalId":40441,"journal":{"name":"H-ermes-Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1285/i22840753n11p41","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"È (im)possibile la repubblica dei beni comuni? Da Kouroukanfouga alle autogestioni locali e ritorno = Is it (im)possible the Republic of Commons? From Kouroukanfouga to local self-government and return\",\"authors\":\"M. Carducci\",\"doi\":\"10.1285/i22840753n11p41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Is it (im)possible the Republic of Commons? From Kouroukanfouga to local self-government and return. The article discusses the issue of the Commons government. After analyzing the divergence of perspectives between Private Law and Constitutional Law Scholars, the author focuses on the transition of constitutionalism from the “biochemistry Era” to the “fossil Era” in order to investigate the consequences of this evolution in local democracy experiences. Only in this perspective, it is possible to identify differences and limitations of both theories (like those proposed by Ostrom and Wilson) and of the historical experiences (from the Kouroukanfouga Charter to the Constitution of Ecuador) of the Commons government.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"H-ermes-Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1285/i22840753n11p41\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"H-ermes-Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1285/i22840753n11p41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"H-ermes-Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1285/i22840753n11p41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

下议院有可能吗?从Kouroukanfouga到地方自治和回归。这篇文章讨论了下议院政府的问题。在分析了私法学者和宪法学学者观点分歧的基础上,作者将重点放在宪政从“生物时代”到“化石时代”的转变上,以考察这种演变在地方民主经验中的后果。只有从这个角度来看,才有可能确定下议院政府的两种理论(如奥斯特罗姆和威尔逊提出的理论)和历史经验(从《库鲁坎福加宪章》到《厄瓜多尔宪法》)的差异和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
È (im)possibile la repubblica dei beni comuni? Da Kouroukanfouga alle autogestioni locali e ritorno = Is it (im)possible the Republic of Commons? From Kouroukanfouga to local self-government and return
Is it (im)possible the Republic of Commons? From Kouroukanfouga to local self-government and return. The article discusses the issue of the Commons government. After analyzing the divergence of perspectives between Private Law and Constitutional Law Scholars, the author focuses on the transition of constitutionalism from the “biochemistry Era” to the “fossil Era” in order to investigate the consequences of this evolution in local democracy experiences. Only in this perspective, it is possible to identify differences and limitations of both theories (like those proposed by Ostrom and Wilson) and of the historical experiences (from the Kouroukanfouga Charter to the Constitution of Ecuador) of the Commons government.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信