不同树脂胶结剂粘结层压单板的抗剪切性能研究

Q3 Dentistry
Zeynep Yeşil Duymuş, Emel Arslan
{"title":"不同树脂胶结剂粘结层压单板的抗剪切性能研究","authors":"Zeynep Yeşil Duymuş, Emel Arslan","doi":"10.7126/cumudj.1187835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the mechanical properties of laminate veneers to determine their resistance to the shear force of three different types of cement used in the restorations. \nMATERIAL and METHODS: Laminate veneers were prepared using the standard tooth preparation methods for 30 extracted maxillary central incisors. To standardize the depth, guide burs were used to prepare a depth of 0.5 mm from the buccal angle. The samples were allocated into three randomized groups (n = 10): Group A (resin using the total etch method and Variolink Esthetic DC resin cement; Group B (resin using the PANAVIA F2.0 self-etch method; and Group C (self-adhesion bonded with Rely X U200 resin cement). The prepared specimens were stored in distilled water for one week before a shear test was used to determine the resistance of the veneers to the bonding. The obtained data were evaluated statistically. \nRESULTS: The values of the shear bond strength were statistically significant depending on the type of resin cement that was applied (p ˂ 0.05). The specimens that were cemented using the total-etch method (18.79±4.48 MPa) had the lowest shear force value. The obtained data were evaluated statistically by Tukey multiple comparison test (p > 0.05). \nCONCLUSIONS: The cement is a highly effective factor in the bonding between fixed prosthetic restorations and the abutment tooth, and the cement used must have sufficient resistance to shear forces.","PeriodicalId":10781,"journal":{"name":"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements\",\"authors\":\"Zeynep Yeşil Duymuş, Emel Arslan\",\"doi\":\"10.7126/cumudj.1187835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the mechanical properties of laminate veneers to determine their resistance to the shear force of three different types of cement used in the restorations. \\nMATERIAL and METHODS: Laminate veneers were prepared using the standard tooth preparation methods for 30 extracted maxillary central incisors. To standardize the depth, guide burs were used to prepare a depth of 0.5 mm from the buccal angle. The samples were allocated into three randomized groups (n = 10): Group A (resin using the total etch method and Variolink Esthetic DC resin cement; Group B (resin using the PANAVIA F2.0 self-etch method; and Group C (self-adhesion bonded with Rely X U200 resin cement). The prepared specimens were stored in distilled water for one week before a shear test was used to determine the resistance of the veneers to the bonding. The obtained data were evaluated statistically. \\nRESULTS: The values of the shear bond strength were statistically significant depending on the type of resin cement that was applied (p ˂ 0.05). The specimens that were cemented using the total-etch method (18.79±4.48 MPa) had the lowest shear force value. The obtained data were evaluated statistically by Tukey multiple comparison test (p > 0.05). \\nCONCLUSIONS: The cement is a highly effective factor in the bonding between fixed prosthetic restorations and the abutment tooth, and the cement used must have sufficient resistance to shear forces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1187835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cumhuriyet Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1187835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨了层压贴面的力学性能,以确定其对三种不同类型的水泥在修复中使用的剪切力的抵抗。材料与方法:对30例拔除的上颌中切牙,采用标准制牙方法制备层压贴面。为了使深度标准化,使用导毛刺从颊角处准备0.5 mm的深度。将样本随机分为3组(n = 10): A组(树脂采用全蚀刻法和Variolink aesthetic DC树脂水泥;B组树脂采用PANAVIA F2.0自蚀刻法;C组(以Rely X U200树脂水泥自粘接)。将制备好的试件在蒸馏水中保存一周,然后进行剪切试验,以确定贴面对粘结的阻力。对所得数据进行统计学评价。结果:抗剪粘结强度值根据所应用的树脂水泥的类型有统计学意义(p小于0.05)。采用全蚀刻法胶结的试件剪切力值(18.79±4.48 MPa)最小。所得资料采用Tukey多重比较检验进行统计学评价(p < 0.05)。结论:骨水泥是固定修复体与基牙粘结的有效因素,所使用的骨水泥必须具有足够的抗剪切力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the mechanical properties of laminate veneers to determine their resistance to the shear force of three different types of cement used in the restorations. MATERIAL and METHODS: Laminate veneers were prepared using the standard tooth preparation methods for 30 extracted maxillary central incisors. To standardize the depth, guide burs were used to prepare a depth of 0.5 mm from the buccal angle. The samples were allocated into three randomized groups (n = 10): Group A (resin using the total etch method and Variolink Esthetic DC resin cement; Group B (resin using the PANAVIA F2.0 self-etch method; and Group C (self-adhesion bonded with Rely X U200 resin cement). The prepared specimens were stored in distilled water for one week before a shear test was used to determine the resistance of the veneers to the bonding. The obtained data were evaluated statistically. RESULTS: The values of the shear bond strength were statistically significant depending on the type of resin cement that was applied (p ˂ 0.05). The specimens that were cemented using the total-etch method (18.79±4.48 MPa) had the lowest shear force value. The obtained data were evaluated statistically by Tukey multiple comparison test (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The cement is a highly effective factor in the bonding between fixed prosthetic restorations and the abutment tooth, and the cement used must have sufficient resistance to shear forces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信