塞尔维亚音乐理论:学科身份合法化的溯源

IF 0.3 2区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
I. Ilic
{"title":"塞尔维亚音乐理论:学科身份合法化的溯源","authors":"I. Ilic","doi":"10.1080/07494467.2022.2203992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In comparison to the (Western) European tradition, the development of music theory in Serbia has been quite short. Milan Milovuk’s works, dating from the 1860s, were the first published theoretical writings in Serbian. Nevertheless, this development was substantial, leading from basic music theory in Milovuk’s pioneering works to an interdisciplinary field of research that is fully integrated into today's global map of the discipline. Through this expansion, the status reconfiguration of music theory in Serbia took place from propaedeutics to an autonomous scientific field. However, the transformation of the discipline was not the subject of scientific research until recently. The questions about the nature of a musical-theoretical work, on what basis and with what convictions it is carried out, what kind of knowledge it produces, and what the impact of that knowledge is can be considered an exception in music theory writings in Serbian. Likewise, the legitimisation of certain types of musical-theoretical work about the discipline as a whole or its relevant parts has only recently become represented in our scientific literature. In this article, I investigate the reasons for the indicated epistemological certainty of music theory in Serbia and study the traces of its disciplinary legitimation in both diachronic (historical-developmental) and synchronic (theoretical–conceptual and methodological-epistemological) perspectives.","PeriodicalId":44746,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Music Review","volume":"41 1","pages":"614 - 643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Music Theory in Serbia: Tracing the Legitimation of the Disciplinary Identity\",\"authors\":\"I. Ilic\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07494467.2022.2203992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In comparison to the (Western) European tradition, the development of music theory in Serbia has been quite short. Milan Milovuk’s works, dating from the 1860s, were the first published theoretical writings in Serbian. Nevertheless, this development was substantial, leading from basic music theory in Milovuk’s pioneering works to an interdisciplinary field of research that is fully integrated into today's global map of the discipline. Through this expansion, the status reconfiguration of music theory in Serbia took place from propaedeutics to an autonomous scientific field. However, the transformation of the discipline was not the subject of scientific research until recently. The questions about the nature of a musical-theoretical work, on what basis and with what convictions it is carried out, what kind of knowledge it produces, and what the impact of that knowledge is can be considered an exception in music theory writings in Serbian. Likewise, the legitimisation of certain types of musical-theoretical work about the discipline as a whole or its relevant parts has only recently become represented in our scientific literature. In this article, I investigate the reasons for the indicated epistemological certainty of music theory in Serbia and study the traces of its disciplinary legitimation in both diachronic (historical-developmental) and synchronic (theoretical–conceptual and methodological-epistemological) perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Music Review\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"614 - 643\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Music Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07494467.2022.2203992\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Music Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07494467.2022.2203992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与(西欧)传统相比,塞尔维亚音乐理论的发展相当短暂。Milan Milovuk的著作可以追溯到19世纪60年代,是第一部以塞尔维亚语出版的理论著作。尽管如此,这一发展是实质性的,从米洛武克开创性作品中的基础音乐理论,到一个跨学科的研究领域,该领域完全融入了当今的全球学科版图。通过这种扩展,塞尔维亚音乐理论的地位发生了重新配置,从原音乐学向一个自主的科学领域转变。然而,直到最近,该学科的转变才成为科学研究的主题。关于音乐理论作品的性质,它是在什么基础上和以什么信念进行的,它产生了什么样的知识,以及这些知识的影响是什么,这些问题可以被视为塞尔维亚语音乐理论著作中的一个例外。同样,关于整个学科或其相关部分的某些类型的音乐理论工作的合法化直到最近才在我们的科学文献中得到体现。在这篇文章中,我调查了塞尔维亚音乐理论在认识论上具有确定性的原因,并从历时(历史发展)和共时(理论-概念和方法论认识论)两个角度研究了其学科合法性的痕迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Music Theory in Serbia: Tracing the Legitimation of the Disciplinary Identity
In comparison to the (Western) European tradition, the development of music theory in Serbia has been quite short. Milan Milovuk’s works, dating from the 1860s, were the first published theoretical writings in Serbian. Nevertheless, this development was substantial, leading from basic music theory in Milovuk’s pioneering works to an interdisciplinary field of research that is fully integrated into today's global map of the discipline. Through this expansion, the status reconfiguration of music theory in Serbia took place from propaedeutics to an autonomous scientific field. However, the transformation of the discipline was not the subject of scientific research until recently. The questions about the nature of a musical-theoretical work, on what basis and with what convictions it is carried out, what kind of knowledge it produces, and what the impact of that knowledge is can be considered an exception in music theory writings in Serbian. Likewise, the legitimisation of certain types of musical-theoretical work about the discipline as a whole or its relevant parts has only recently become represented in our scientific literature. In this article, I investigate the reasons for the indicated epistemological certainty of music theory in Serbia and study the traces of its disciplinary legitimation in both diachronic (historical-developmental) and synchronic (theoretical–conceptual and methodological-epistemological) perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Contemporary Music Review provides a forum for musicians and musicologists to discuss recent musical currents in both breadth and depth. The main concern of the journal is the critical study of music today in all its aspects—its techniques of performance and composition, texts and contexts, aesthetics, technologies, and relationships with other disciplines and currents of thought. The journal may also serve as a vehicle to communicate documentary materials, interviews, and other items of interest to contemporary music scholars. All articles are subjected to rigorous peer review before publication. Proposals for themed issues are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信