通过广泛和精读的听力培养第二语言的听力理解能力

IF 1 Q2 LINGUISTICS
AILA Review Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1075/aila.22015.kar
Omar Karlin, Sayaka Karlin
{"title":"通过广泛和精读的听力培养第二语言的听力理解能力","authors":"Omar Karlin, Sayaka Karlin","doi":"10.1075/aila.22015.kar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the fall semester of 2020, 269 Japanese university students\n were compared in a quasi-experimental study to determine whether extensive and\n intensive listening interventions yielded significant gains in L2 listening\n comprehension. At the beginning of the study, 269 students took a 100-item L2\n listening exam, and were randomly placed into an extensive\n (n = 135) or intensive listening group\n (n = 134). After each group completed five assignments based on\n extensive or intensive listening principles, students took another 100-item L2\n listening exam. Paired-sample t-tests of raw scores and Rasch person ability\n estimates indicated that the extensive listening group significantly improved in\n raw scores, t(134) = −7.44, p = .00, but not\n in Rasch person ability estimates t(134) = −1.86,\n p = .07, while the intensive listening group significantly\n improved in both raw scores, t(133) = −9.48,\n p = .00, and Rasch person ability estimates,\n t(133) = −3.58, p = .00.","PeriodicalId":45044,"journal":{"name":"AILA Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing L2 listening comprehension through extensive and intensive\\n listening\",\"authors\":\"Omar Karlin, Sayaka Karlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/aila.22015.kar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In the fall semester of 2020, 269 Japanese university students\\n were compared in a quasi-experimental study to determine whether extensive and\\n intensive listening interventions yielded significant gains in L2 listening\\n comprehension. At the beginning of the study, 269 students took a 100-item L2\\n listening exam, and were randomly placed into an extensive\\n (n = 135) or intensive listening group\\n (n = 134). After each group completed five assignments based on\\n extensive or intensive listening principles, students took another 100-item L2\\n listening exam. Paired-sample t-tests of raw scores and Rasch person ability\\n estimates indicated that the extensive listening group significantly improved in\\n raw scores, t(134) = −7.44, p = .00, but not\\n in Rasch person ability estimates t(134) = −1.86,\\n p = .07, while the intensive listening group significantly\\n improved in both raw scores, t(133) = −9.48,\\n p = .00, and Rasch person ability estimates,\\n t(133) = −3.58, p = .00.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AILA Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AILA Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.22015.kar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AILA Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.22015.kar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2020年秋季学期,一项准实验研究对269名日本大学生进行了比较,以确定广泛和强化的听力干预是否能显著提高二语听力理解。在研究开始时,269名学生参加了一项100项的L2听力考试,并被随机分为一组(n = 135)或强化听力组(n = 134)。在每组完成五项基于广泛或强化听力原则的作业后,学生们又参加了一项100项的L2听力考试。原始成绩和Rasch人能力评估的配对样本t检验表明,广泛听力组的原始成绩显著提高,t(134) = −7.44,p = .00,但不在Rasch人的能力估计t(134) = −1.86,p = .07,而强化听力组在两个原始分数上都有显著改善,t(133) = −9.48,p = .00,和Rasch人的能力估计,t(133) = −3.58,p = .0
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing L2 listening comprehension through extensive and intensive listening
In the fall semester of 2020, 269 Japanese university students were compared in a quasi-experimental study to determine whether extensive and intensive listening interventions yielded significant gains in L2 listening comprehension. At the beginning of the study, 269 students took a 100-item L2 listening exam, and were randomly placed into an extensive (n = 135) or intensive listening group (n = 134). After each group completed five assignments based on extensive or intensive listening principles, students took another 100-item L2 listening exam. Paired-sample t-tests of raw scores and Rasch person ability estimates indicated that the extensive listening group significantly improved in raw scores, t(134) = −7.44, p = .00, but not in Rasch person ability estimates t(134) = −1.86, p = .07, while the intensive listening group significantly improved in both raw scores, t(133) = −9.48, p = .00, and Rasch person ability estimates, t(133) = −3.58, p = .00.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AILA Review
AILA Review LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: AILA Review is a refereed publication of the Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliquée, an international federation of national associations for applied linguistics. All volumes are guest edited. As of volume 16, 2003, AILA Review is published with John Benjamins. This journal is peer reviewed and indexed in: Scopus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信