阿布·希迪克(公元108年)和卡塔达(公元118年)在《迈赫迪圣训》叙述中的分层

Kinkin Syamsudin, M. D. Rodliyana
{"title":"阿布·希迪克(公元108年)和卡塔达(公元118年)在《迈赫迪圣训》叙述中的分层","authors":"Kinkin Syamsudin, M. D. Rodliyana","doi":"10.28918/religia.v25i1.4235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the presence or absence of different effects in rawi stratification on hadith narration. The research used was the study of libraries with a content analysis approach based on Ibn Khaldun's stratification theory in the book of Muqaddimah. The study focused on the hadiths of al-Mahdi narrated through the path of Abu al-Shiddiq (d. 108 H) and Abu Nadhrah (d. 103 H). It was found that Qatadah was abu al-Shiddiq's disciple who received the most history, but specifically the history of al-Mahdi he did not receive from him but from another teacher named Abu Nadhrah. The three narrations are both considered as rawi tsiqah, but they have differences in stratification that can expressly be seen the number of hadiths narrated. Qatadah has a history of 12,209, while Abu al-Shiddiq 183 and Abu Nadhrah 1,181. By compiling Ibn Khaldun's stratification theory and data on the number of histories owned by these three rawi people, it is concluded that the difference in stratification between Abu al-Shiddiq, Abu Nadhrah and Qatadah is not the reason Qatadah was not involved in the narration of al-Mahdi hadith from Abu al-Shiddiq.","PeriodicalId":31647,"journal":{"name":"Religia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Stratification of Abu al-Shiddiq (w. 108 H) and Qatadah (w. 118 H) in the Narration of the al-Mahdi Hadith\",\"authors\":\"Kinkin Syamsudin, M. D. Rodliyana\",\"doi\":\"10.28918/religia.v25i1.4235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the presence or absence of different effects in rawi stratification on hadith narration. The research used was the study of libraries with a content analysis approach based on Ibn Khaldun's stratification theory in the book of Muqaddimah. The study focused on the hadiths of al-Mahdi narrated through the path of Abu al-Shiddiq (d. 108 H) and Abu Nadhrah (d. 103 H). It was found that Qatadah was abu al-Shiddiq's disciple who received the most history, but specifically the history of al-Mahdi he did not receive from him but from another teacher named Abu Nadhrah. The three narrations are both considered as rawi tsiqah, but they have differences in stratification that can expressly be seen the number of hadiths narrated. Qatadah has a history of 12,209, while Abu al-Shiddiq 183 and Abu Nadhrah 1,181. By compiling Ibn Khaldun's stratification theory and data on the number of histories owned by these three rawi people, it is concluded that the difference in stratification between Abu al-Shiddiq, Abu Nadhrah and Qatadah is not the reason Qatadah was not involved in the narration of al-Mahdi hadith from Abu al-Shiddiq.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28918/religia.v25i1.4235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28918/religia.v25i1.4235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了原始分层对圣训叙述的不同影响的存在与否。本研究采用的是基于伊本·赫勒敦在《穆卡迪玛》一书中提出的分层理论的内容分析方法对图书馆进行研究。研究集中在通过Abu al-Shiddiq(公元108年)和Abu Nadhrah(公元103年)的路径讲述的al-Mahdi的圣训上。研究发现,Qatadah是Abu al-Shiddiq的门徒,他接受了最多的历史,但具体来说,他不是从他那里接受的al-Mahdi的历史,而是从另一位名叫Abu Nadhrah的老师那里接受的。这三种叙述都被认为是rawi tsiqah,但它们在分层上有所不同,这可以明显地看出所叙述的圣训的数量。Qatadah有12209年的历史,Abu al-Shiddiq有183年的历史,Abu Nadhrah有1181年的历史。通过整理伊本·赫勒敦的分层理论和这三位拉维人拥有的历史资料,我们可以得出结论:阿布·希迪克、阿布·纳德拉和卡塔达之间的分层差异并不是卡塔达没有参与阿布·希迪克的马赫迪圣训叙述的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Stratification of Abu al-Shiddiq (w. 108 H) and Qatadah (w. 118 H) in the Narration of the al-Mahdi Hadith
This article discusses the presence or absence of different effects in rawi stratification on hadith narration. The research used was the study of libraries with a content analysis approach based on Ibn Khaldun's stratification theory in the book of Muqaddimah. The study focused on the hadiths of al-Mahdi narrated through the path of Abu al-Shiddiq (d. 108 H) and Abu Nadhrah (d. 103 H). It was found that Qatadah was abu al-Shiddiq's disciple who received the most history, but specifically the history of al-Mahdi he did not receive from him but from another teacher named Abu Nadhrah. The three narrations are both considered as rawi tsiqah, but they have differences in stratification that can expressly be seen the number of hadiths narrated. Qatadah has a history of 12,209, while Abu al-Shiddiq 183 and Abu Nadhrah 1,181. By compiling Ibn Khaldun's stratification theory and data on the number of histories owned by these three rawi people, it is concluded that the difference in stratification between Abu al-Shiddiq, Abu Nadhrah and Qatadah is not the reason Qatadah was not involved in the narration of al-Mahdi hadith from Abu al-Shiddiq.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信