从法院对建筑条件的裁决看规划纠纷。以波兰为例

IF 2 Q3 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING

Planning Practice and Research Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.1080/02697459.2023.2186358

M. Nowak, P. Śleszyński, A. Ostrowska, Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel, Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka, Andrei Mitrea

{"title":"从法院对建筑条件的裁决看规划纠纷。以波兰为例","authors":"M. Nowak, P. Śleszyński, A. Ostrowska, Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel, Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka, Andrei Mitrea","doi":"10.1080/02697459.2023.2186358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Our main aim is to identify the key features of spatial disputes concerning decisions on building conditions that concluded with a court decision. Parties to such planning disputes, directions of court decisions and territorial regularities were all identified. Both the database of administrative rulings of the Supreme Administrative Court (391 judgments in 205 municipalities) and data on local spatial planning documents (2.5 million decisions in 2,477 municipalities in Poland) were used. The results show that the initiators of planning disputes concluded in court are mainly property owners and their neighbours. Courts are more likely to uphold an investor’s complaint.","PeriodicalId":54201,"journal":{"name":"Planning Practice and Research","volume":"38 1","pages":"425 - 446"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planning disputes from the perspective of court rulings on building conditions. A case study of Poland\",\"authors\":\"M. Nowak, P. Śleszyński, A. Ostrowska, Anna Oleńczuk-Paszel, Monika Śpiewak-Szyjka, Andrei Mitrea\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02697459.2023.2186358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Our main aim is to identify the key features of spatial disputes concerning decisions on building conditions that concluded with a court decision. Parties to such planning disputes, directions of court decisions and territorial regularities were all identified. Both the database of administrative rulings of the Supreme Administrative Court (391 judgments in 205 municipalities) and data on local spatial planning documents (2.5 million decisions in 2,477 municipalities in Poland) were used. The results show that the initiators of planning disputes concluded in court are mainly property owners and their neighbours. Courts are more likely to uphold an investor’s complaint.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planning Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"425 - 446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planning Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2023.2186358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2023.2186358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

我们的主要目的是确定与法院判决有关的建筑条件决定的空间争议的关键特征。这些规划纠纷的当事方、法院判决的指示和领土规则都被确定。使用了最高行政法院行政裁决数据库(205个城市的391项判决)和地方空间规划文件数据(波兰2 477个城市的250万项决定)。结果表明，法院审结的规划纠纷的发起者主要是业主及其邻居。法院更有可能支持投资者的投诉。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Planning disputes from the perspective of court rulings on building conditions. A case study of Poland

ABSTRACT Our main aim is to identify the key features of spatial disputes concerning decisions on building conditions that concluded with a court decision. Parties to such planning disputes, directions of court decisions and territorial regularities were all identified. Both the database of administrative rulings of the Supreme Administrative Court (391 judgments in 205 municipalities) and data on local spatial planning documents (2.5 million decisions in 2,477 municipalities in Poland) were used. The results show that the initiators of planning disputes concluded in court are mainly property owners and their neighbours. Courts are more likely to uphold an investor’s complaint.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Planning Practice and Research REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

18.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： Over the last decade, Planning Practice & Research (PPR) has established itself as the source for information on current research in planning practice. It is intended for reflective, critical academics, professionals and students who are concerned to keep abreast of and challenge current thinking. PPR is committed to: •bridging the gaps between planning research, practice and education, and between different planning systems •providing a forum for an international readership to discuss and review research on planning practice